The Rotten FBI Investigation

Thoughts from Austin Bay, and Andrew McCarthy.

I think that Comey and Lynch should be impeached. Both the Clintons and Obama corrupt everything they come in contact with.

[Tuesday-morning update]

What did Obama know, and when did he know it? It’s becoming pretty clear that in order to find her guilty (which she was and is) they would have also had to expose his guilt. And we still don’t know if there was contact between Lerner and the White House, because of the IRS cover up.

[Update a couple minutes later]

The FBI colluded with the Democrats and Team Clinton on the email “investigation.”

14 thoughts on “The Rotten FBI Investigation”

  1. Comey can be fired in January and replaced by someone that would do the job of making the FBI great again.

    Comey claims Clinton didn’t ‘intend’ to break the law, so Gowdy proves the intent in the only way intent can be proved… definitively showing Clinton’s actions and lies prove intent.

    Even though gross negligence is proven and intent isn’t required. Comey has treated us all as idiots and so far getting away with it.

    Am I correct that all those given immunity expires with the next admin. as well?

  2. This has to be one of the most corrupt times in our country’s history. Its certainly on par with the late 1800’s.

    1. The difference being if we had the information then that we do now the public would have fixed it in a twinkle. The problem today is apathy. Which is the intent of the politicians.

    2. The economy was growing rapidly, taxes were low and the military actually won wars. Those were the days.

  3. From http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/michael-chertoff-endorses-clinton-229044

    Former Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff, once the lead Republican lawyer on the Senate committee investigating Bill and Hillary Clinton’s Whitewater scandal, will vote for the former secretary of state for president this fall.

    Chertoff told Bloomberg that his decision to support Clinton over Donald Trump came down to the former’s stronger stance on national security issues and the latter’s inability to control his impulses. That he and the Democratic nominee have a history of conflict dating back to the 1990s pales in comparison to the threat Chertoff said Trump poses to American security.

    I acknowledge this comment is a bit tangential. Obviously, I’m not showing that Clinton isn’t corrupt here, but presumably Chertoff’s role in the whitewater investigation has led him consider Clinton’s alleged corruption more than most Americans, and I think it is a given that he knows more about the threats to our national security than most Americans, and so I thought this story was noteworthy here.

    1. Whoops, I meant to add that I think Chertoff would carefully weigh the mishandling of classified information in his decision.

    2. Forced to choose, Chertoff can see the difference between a minor scandal that’s been relentlessly hyped for political gain, and an actual threat to national security.

      Similarly, forced to choose between accepting that Clinton’s actions weren’t criminal, and believing in a dark fantasy in which the Republican FBI head and his subordinates secretly conspired to obstruct justice on Clinton’s behalf, many on the right apparently insist on believing the fairy tale. It’s as if Clinton hatred has driven them completely nuts.

      1. Actual threats like giving missile tech to the Chinese and uranium to the Russian’s. Oh you mean the threat of calling someone a cow who has a contractual obligation to maintain their physical appearance.

        1. Not a cow, but a puppet character in a popular entertainment, which could be described as a vain, self-absorbed, and fashion conscious anthropomorphic pig. As well as an immigrant employee in the hospitality industry.

          Mr. Anthony, please try and keep up!

        2. What, Clinton let Russia buy uranium? Stop the presses. Next you’ll tell me that they may build a nuclear bomb.

          Back in reality:

          Russia’s purchase of the company “had as much of an impact on national security as it would have if they set the money on fire,” said Lewis.

          Meanwhile, Trump tried to violate the Cuban embargo, rented to an Iranian bank with terror ties, promises to turn NATO and our Pacific alliances into protection rackets, is in debt to who knows how many foreign interests, admires the people who brought down MH17, gullibly believes ridiculous Infowars-level conspiracy theories, hires fools and knaves, has the emotional stability of a teething toddler, and has shown that he can be easily manipulated by adversaries (e.g. see how Clinton baited him into his Miss Universe tantrums).

          1. I’m sure you would have voted Remain, for our own good of course. Those central bankers colluding to remove self-determination of citizens is just a dark fantasy

Comments are closed.