No, Howard Dean

There is no “hate speech” exception to the First Amendment:

Of course, one can certainly argue that First Amendment law should be changed to allow bans on hate speech (whether bigoted speech, blasphemy, blasphemy to which foreigners may respond with attacks on Americans, flag burning, or anything else). I think no such exception should be recognized, but of course, like all questions about what the law ought to be, this is a matter that can be debated. Indeed, people have a First Amendment right to call for speech restrictions, just as they have a First Amendment right to call for gun bans or bans on Islam or government-imposed race discrimination or anything else that current constitutional law forbids. Constitutional law is no more set in stone than any other law.

But those who want to make such arguments should acknowledge that they are calling for a change in First Amendment law and should explain just what that change would be, so people can thoughtfully evaluate it. Calls for a new First Amendment exception for “hate speech” shouldn’t rely just on the undefined term “hate speech” — they should explain just what viewpoints the government would be allowed to suppress, what viewpoints would remain protected and how judges, juries and prosecutors are supposed to distinguish the two. And claiming that hate speech is already “not protected by the first amendment,” as if one is just restating settled law, does not suffice.

These people are idiots.

4 thoughts on “No, Howard Dean”

  1. Democrats believe in relative truth. A thing is true simply if enough people continually repeat it. That this defies logic (“speech that doesn’t offend requires no protection”) has no meaning or impact.

    It’s trying to use reason on the unreasonable.

  2. Calls for a new First Amendment exception for “hate speech” shouldn’t rely just on the undefined term “hate speech”

    It has to be undefined. Just like changing of PC language, what is determined to be “hateful” has to constantly shift. The goal isn’t people using non-hateful language but to create chaos and a constantly shifting line of where people are expected to enthusiastically be.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *