I think we have two groups that incongruously oppose, while crossing political lines. One group see the technology as an existential threat to their careers, while the other sees little value in the technology.
I’ve seen executives extol its virtue in summarizing, but you can feel the pressure that is experienced by those being summarized. After all what if they just gave the raw data to the thing and it wrote the report, which it then summarized.
The skeptics ask it questions it cannot answer, either because the question was unclear (to a computer), or simply too complex for what is now a primitive application.
Neither camp sees value.
It’s all just marketing. Rename it a cancer research center and call it a day.
I think we have two groups that incongruously oppose, while crossing political lines. One group see the technology as an existential threat to their careers, while the other sees little value in the technology.
I’ve seen executives extol its virtue in summarizing, but you can feel the pressure that is experienced by those being summarized. After all what if they just gave the raw data to the thing and it wrote the report, which it then summarized.
The skeptics ask it questions it cannot answer, either because the question was unclear (to a computer), or simply too complex for what is now a primitive application.
Neither camp sees value.
Very good article. I’d suggest even recommended reading for anyone considering the issue.
It seems Elon is ahead of the curve on this one – launching datacentres into space will bypass a lot of the rising resistance.