The weather at the landing site isn’t acceptable. Look like only chance of demo’ing the landing on this mission is if it gets delayed to February 20th or beyond.
[Update shortly after launch]
All seems to be nominal so far, a few minutes after a beautiful sunset launch.
[Update a couple hours after launch]
SpaceX reports that the rocket came down vertical within ten meters of the virtual target. IOW, the landing probably would have worked if not for sea state.
I just went from a 3.8 MGHz to 4.1 MGHz processor (A10-6800K), and doubled memory, from 8 GB of 1366 to 16 GB of 2133. The difference in performance is amazing. Mostly due to memory, I suspect (the only difference in CPU is the slight percentage increase in speed). Now to go put the old CPU and memory in her machine, which will be an upgrade for her Windows system.
[Update a few minutes later]
I’m sure the fact that the OS is on an SSD doesn’t hurt, either.
[Update late afternoon]
Oh, goody. In order to give her computer the new CPU/memory, I have to change the motherboard out, too, but the HP Pavilion case doesn’t seem to have cables marked. Sigh.
A first look.
Scrubbed for high-level winds.
The good news about today's #DSCOVR scrub is that tomorrow may be better weather for a landing attempt. Also, no distraction from Dragon.
— Rand Simberg (@Rand_Simberg) February 10, 2015
Thoughts from Instapundit on the FAA’s lunar move.
You know what else wasn’t reported much? The problems with SLS/Orion in the ASAP report. All the focus was on “lack of transparency” in commercial crew.
[Update a while later]
More thoughts from Tom Meyer.
[Early-afternoon update]
Analysis from Matt Schaefer, of the space law department at Nebraska.
…has increased industry consolidation, and destroyed community banks.
Gee, it’s almost like that was the intent.
They got the go-ahead a while ago to start fueling. Things are on schedule, as far as I know.
[Update a little over an hour before launch]
Everything still progressing nominally.
Here’s some good technical background on SpaceX’s quest for reusability. Assuming it’s accurate (and I didn’t see any obvious problems), that is a great, detailed description of the Falcon 9 (and its history).
[Update after scrub]
They scrubbed, primarily (it seems) due to a range radar problem.
This is why SpaceX wants to go to Brownsville. Tired of depending on antique improperly-maintained hardware at CCAFS.
— Rand Simberg (@Rand_Simberg) February 8, 2015
The Cape was down for weeks last spring for exactly the same radar issue: http://t.co/JLi4nC2sVQ This is unacceptable in 21st century.
— Rand Simberg (@Rand_Simberg) February 8, 2015
A little background on the antiquity of range radar at both Eastern and Western Test Ranges: https://t.co/z8ThcgECuB Goes back to 50s.
— Rand Simberg (@Rand_Simberg) February 8, 2015
In the 21st century, range tracking should be via GPS, not radar. For example, Kodiak Launch Complex doesn't require radar tracking.
— Rand Simberg (@Rand_Simberg) February 8, 2015
No, I don’t have strong opinions about this at all…
How it closed down a San Francisco book store.
Unexpectedly!
OK, actually, on the telephone. I’ll be having a Ricochet discussion with John Walker in half an hour to talk space stuff (probably including today’s Falcon fly-back attempt, and the ASAP report).
To participate, call +1 712 432 0375, then enter the access code 139584# and confirm by pressing 1. To enter the access code, you may have to put your phone into tone dialing mode, which may not be the default if you’re on ISDN.
Here’s the link for Ricochet members (it’s behind the paywall).
[Update a couple hours later]
Here’s the audio, for those interested.
I disagree with this. He seems to be operating under the delusion that NASA is ever going to get anyone to Mars, and seemingly ignores the people with money who are working to do so.