All posts by Rand Simberg

Intifada In Ann Arbor

The University of Michigan is going to be sponsoring a Palestinian hatefest in a couple of weeks in Ann Arbor.

A couple nice quotes:

Glossing over Palestinian terrorism, the mission statement declares “it is not our place to dictate the strategies or tactics adopted by the Palestinians in their struggle for liberation.” This outsourcing of morality allows the group to focus on Israel’s sins while ignoring those slaughtered by Palestinian suicide bombers.

and

You have to wonder two things: How would the university react had the Klan or some other extremist group spouting racist, sexist or homophopic hate speech asked for a platform on campus? And when did anti-Semitism lose its seat on the bus of political correctness?

Though A Racist Prism

Nelson Mandela continues to dissipate his reputation with foolish statements. Now he says that the UN is getting dissed by the US because Kofi Annan is black. Following his recent comments that Israel is a “white” nation and Iraq is a “black” one, this myopic and distorted race-based view of politics is rendering, if it hasn’t already rendered, this once-notable and respected man into utter irrelevance.

The Android-American

Mark Steyn doesn’t think much of Al Gore’s latest attempt at relevance.

The whole thing, as usual, is worth reading, but my favorite bits:

The sight of the Democratic Party wrestling with its conscience is like some old-time carnie freak show: It’s strangely compelling, but you can’t help feeling it’s cruel to put these poor misfits on public display.

and

In fairness to Al, the boy genius was one of only a few senior Democrats with a 12-year consistent robust record on Iraq. But, demonstrating his usual political instincts, he chose to discard his pro-war stance just as his party’s senators were discarding their anti-war stance. The Dems have pulled off a remarkable double: Not only does the leadership’s belated approval for war look opportunistic, but so does Al Gore’s belated opposition to it.

Also read his revised lyrics to the old song, “War!”

Taking Up The Offer

One of the bloggers (I disremember who) was taking up a collection to offer trips to Baghdad for the anti-war types. Some idiotarians are actually going to Baghdad to serve as human shields for Saddam, though it’s not clear that they’re aware of the possibility of subsidization by the “warbloggers.”

Kelly, who has made 16 trips to Iraq, sounds unflinching. She is driven by the tremendous collateral damage inflicted by today’s weapons. The United Nations described the damage to Iraq after the gulf war as “near- apocalyptic.”

“You can’t be a vegetarian only between meals,” said Kelly, 49. “And you can’t be a pacifist only between wars.”

She has been blunt when recruiting volunteers for this trip: “We are asking people to be able to say they have had a good life and this could be their last year.”

She hasn’t been paying attention. The precision on weaponry had increased tremendously since the Gulf War. Collateral damage will be minimal. The problem is, she probably considers all damage to Iraq as collateral.

She shouldn’t worry too much about the getting killed thing, though. They’ll always be able to surrender to French journalists, just like the Republican Guard does.

[Update at 2:40 PM PDT]

Now I remember. It was the Shropshire Challenge courtesy of Dr. Weevil.

Agonizing

A company Down Under is selling screaming dolls. They emit shrieks when you stretch them lengthwise, and their little eyes bulge out, a la Bart Simpson, when you choke them. The anti-violence types are, rhetorically at least, up in arms–they’re afraid that it will desensitize children to violence.

But it brings to mind other applications, much less violent, employing voice-recognition technology. How about a Tom Daschle or Dick Gephardt doll, that screams in agony whenever you threaten it with a tax cut, or non-union federal workers? Or a Bob Byrd doll (with optional white hood accessory), along with a pair of scissors, that whines when you cut out amendments for new proposals to move the federal government to West Virginia? Or a Chuckie Schumer and DiFi matched set that quiver at the sight of a gun? Or a Hillary doll–you supply the screams yourself…

The possibilities intrigue.

Rocket-Engine Naming Contest

I (and some NASA folks) are looking for suggestions for a name for NASA’s new nuclear propulsion initiative–something more poetic and mythical than, say, “Nuclear Propulsion Initiative” (though NPI is at least as good a TLA as SLI).

These are my initial thoughts:

We could call it Son of Orion, but Orion had no offspring–he was killed by the father of a woman he courted, via scorpion or other means, depending on the version of the story. And Son Of Orion makes it sound too much like a bad Japanese SF movie. Heyyyyy…how about Mothra? Or Rodan? Or Godzilla? Let’s borrow from modern mythology.

Hermes or Mercury would be most appropriate, but they’re taken. At least Mercury is (since the European Hermes never flew, perhaps it could be considered to be still available).

How about Argo? A propulsion system fit for long voyages. The JASONS would like it, if they were still around, but I think that DARPA has disbanded/defunded them…

Of course, if we want to go Norse, I don’t think that Odin has ever been used for anything significant.

It might be sacriligeous to the Indians, but Hindus aren’t all that uptight about such things, generally, so we could also go with Kalki, the tenth (and yet to appear) avatar of Vishnu. He will come astride a white horse, with a sword blazing like the tail of a comet. Seems appropriate to me…

Does anyone have any other suggestions? My experience is that my readership is generally better read and more knowledgable than me (at least collectively). Any classicists out there with more ideas?