The Chinese are claiming they’ve successfully tested it on orbit.
I remain skeptical.
All posts by Rand Simberg
Merry Christmas, And Happy New Year
And Happy Chanuka, to all my readers.
Posting will be light/non-existent for the next couple weeks. Patricia and I are flying to London tomorrow evening, for our first real vacation in a long time, and we’re scrambling around, while making a Christmas Eve dinner, to prepare for the trip. We’ll be there, and on the Continent (largely Benelux and France), and back on January 7th.
2016 has been a rough year (even ignoring the politics), with the death of Patricia’s eldest brother and mother, and all the time I spent in Florida getting the house ready to sell. But we sold it, and she has a new job, and we’re going to celebrate New Year’s Eve in Paris, where neither of us have ever been. We’ll try not to get blown up or stabbed or run over.
[Christmas-morning update]
I’ve always thought that the Wexford Carol was one of the most beautiful. Hard to imagine it being done better than this.
And on a lighter note, “I Saw Daddy Pat Down Santa Claus.”
[Update a few minutes later]
OK, this is heartwarming.
Two T-Rexes Fighting Over Baby Jesus.
Merry Christmas! pic.twitter.com/5q9uYADsAO
— Faces in Things (@FacesPics) December 25, 2016
[Update a while later]
It’s that crucial time of year to give your cat an annual performance review.
A New Little Ice Age
Has it already started?
Earth’s new climate will affect much more than the energy sector. Abdussamatov leaves us with a dire warning.
“The world must start preparing for the new Little Ice Age right now. Politicians and business leaders must make full economic calculations of the impact of the new Little Ice Age on everything — industry, agriculture, living conditions, development. The most reasonable way to fight against the new Little Ice Age is a complex of special steps aimed at support of economic growth and energy-saving production to adapt mankind to the forthcoming period of deep cooling.”
An overheated planet has never been a threat, say climate skeptics, not today, not ever in human history. An underheated planet, in contrast, is a threat humans have repeatedly faced over the last millennium, and now we’re due again.
To me, the evidence is quite a bit more compelling than it is for warming. He’s relying on history and empirical data, not computer models.
The Original War On Christmas
…was fought by the Nazis.
For historical ignorami who think that the Nazis were Christian.
To The Moon?
Bob Zimmmerman speculates on what the Trump administration might do in civil space policy.
Obama’s Drilling Ban
Trump should immediately rescind it.
Yes. I hope he spends his first week doing nothing except reversing all these unlawful unconstitutional executive orders.
[Friday-afternoon update]
Obama’s midnight-regulation express:
Any action that is rushed is likely to be shoddy, especially if it’s from the federal government. The point is for Mr. Obama to have his way and to swamp the Trump administration with a dizzying array of new rules to have to undo. That diverts manpower from bigger and better priorities.
President Obama is hoping this work will prove too much and his rules will stand. He’d be making a good bet. George W. Bush promised to undo last-minute Clinton regulations. Yet a paper done in 2005 by Jason M. Loring and Liam R. Roth in Wake Forest Law Review found that a whopping 82% were left to stand.
Then again, a Republican Congress seems ready and willing to invoke the Congressional Review Act, which allows legislators to reject rule-making. More important, Mr. Trump and his team seem to understand that Americans are angry at Mr. Obama’s tendency to rule like an autocrat. They also surely know how damaging many of these Obama parting gifts (particularly energy rules) will prove to their own agenda.
A Trump administration could send a powerful message to future presidents and build public support by highlighting the “midnight regulation” phenomenon and then making it a priority to ax every final Obama order. Single them out. Make a public list. Celebrate every repeal. That would be as profound a rebuke to the Obama legacy—a legacy based on abuse of power—as any other.
Also a reminder that the Bush administration was terrible on regulations and small government. I don’t see why undoing all those would require much “manpower.” Getting rid of them would be a good start to “draining the swamp.”
Curing Diabetes
Faster, please.
Moon Versus Mars
A (sort of) debate between Paul Spudis and John Grunsfeld. I think that Grunsfeld is far too pessimistic about the moon, but I also think that this debate is irrelevant. Our future in space will be determined by billionaires, not Congress or NASA.
The Future
Stephen Pinker says don’t be so glum.
My Lawsuit
Yes, there has been a ruling, over two years after argument in the appeals court. I’ll have a comment after discussing with counsel.
[Update a few minutes later]
For what it’s worth, here’s Mark Steyn’s take.
[Update a while later]
Here are the official statements from CEI and counsel:
Statement from CEI General Counsel Sam Kazman:
Today’s ruling simply means this case will proceed and the Superior Court will now consider the merits of both sides’ arguments. The Competitive Enterprise Institute is a staunch defender of free speech and open, public debate, and we are confident we’ll prevail on the merits as this case goes back to Court. As a public figure with his own history of harshly attacking those who disagree with him, Michael Mann must now show that CEI’s commentary met some very stringent standards of malice. It did not, and we will continue to fight against those who seek to punish and harass groups and individuals who speak out on controversial issues.
Statement from Andrew Grossman, CEI’s attorney and partner at BakerHostetler:
Today’s decision throws out half of Michael Mann’s claims against the Competitive Enterprise Institute and sends the others back to the Superior Court for further consideration. We are confident that Dr. Mann’s remaining claims will ultimately fail, because they attempt to shut down speech and debate that is absolutely protected by the First Amendment. Today’s decision only draws out Dr. Mann’s years-long effort to wage “lawfare” against his opponents instead of engaging in public debate.
So, on we go.
[Update a few minutes later]
Here‘s the story from Buzzfeed, FWIW.
[Noon update]
Thoughts from Jonathan Adler.
[Friday update]
National Review‘s formal response to the ruling.