No, it’s not based on a “scientific mistake.”
And yes, the morning-after pill is an abortafacient.
No, it’s not based on a “scientific mistake.”
And yes, the morning-after pill is an abortafacient.
This woman is an excellent example of it.
…the only reason this conflict arose was a New Deal-era tax loophole that gave birth to our peculiar employer-based health care system. The main lesson of Hobby Lobby is that this system has to go.
Yes. Of course, ObamaCare should never have happened, either, for the same reason.
A bunch of reasons to have one.
I’m not particularly persuaded by the carbon footprint thing, though.
Yes, the Republicans should pass a bill to allow it.
…and how to make it better.
Shockingly to union supporters, a union can’t force someone taking care of her disabled son to pay union dues for the privilege.
And there’s another blow to ObamaCare’s attempt to run our lives:
The 5-4 decision is a significant victory for those challenging the constitutionality of the President Obama’s health care law. And it strengthens the argument that for-profit entities, like individuals and churches, have religious rights.
So you don’t lose your religious freedom because you make a profit.
Huh.
[Update mid afternoon]
The funniest thing on Twitter today, amidst all the illogic, hatred and hysteria, is the number of people who think that @SCOTUSblog is actually SCOTUS’s blog (and Twitter feed) and attacking them. The @SCOTUSblog folks are having a lot of fun with it.
There is no end of examples.
Sadly, it’s dumb because we’ve dumbed down the electorate.
Did their diet prevent dental caries?