…is expanding. And it appears that the FBI is trying to cover it up.
History will record that the Obama administration was guilty of abuses of power that Nixon could only dream of.
…is expanding. And it appears that the FBI is trying to cover it up.
History will record that the Obama administration was guilty of abuses of power that Nixon could only dream of.
For those in a hurry, a cute one-minute haggadah.
The left brought it on itself by insisting on the politicization of judges. For a leftist, nothing can be outside politics, and political power takes precedence over the law. Fortunately, we may still have a chance to restore originalism, and the Constitution.
[Update early afternoon]
If judges want to make laws and bypass the legislature, let them be elected, not appointed for life.
Over at PJMedia, I write that the Republicans should have made the Democrats really do it.
This looks like an interesting new book by Alex McDonald. Kindle version seems kind of spendy, though, same as hardcover.
It’s been a hundred years since we entered it. Some thoughts on how it changed the world.
I think Sam Kriss had a little too much time on his hands.
Thoughts on the duty of the courts to enforce the Constitution and the law, from Glenn Reynolds. It’s based on new book by Randy Barnett.
[Late-morning update]
Actually, Neil Gorsuch is for the little guy:
It’s hard to see what Hirono, Senate Democratic leader Charles Schumer and all the other Democrats are talking about when they say Gorsuch doesn’t stick up for the little guy. But if you look more closely at his cases and the Democrats’ charges, you realize what the Democrats mean.
First, in Yellowbear, Little Sisters, Makkar, Carloss and the burping case, Gorsuch was ruling against government overreach. In Kelo, he praised the ruling against the government. And there’s the issue. When Democrats talk about being for the little guy, they often mean being for government power. The two concepts are inseparable in the liberal mind-set.
And when they conflict, they go for the government power every time. That’s why they shouldn’t be called “liberals.”
No one concerned about traditions of the Senate would be advocating a party-line filibuster of a Supreme Court nominee. #CrocodileTears
— Rand Simberg (@Rand_Simberg) April 4, 2017
Don't give them an easy out. Make them actually filibuster from the well. Show the public what real obstructionism looks like. https://t.co/8RswBd3iIB
— Rand Simberg (@Rand_Simberg) April 4, 2017
An interesting bit of history about the Wrights that I’d never heard before.
Patrick Moore has a letter to the editor. Unfortunately, the GreenWarmMongers he left behind still believe the lunacy.