This is a general problem of the Left, but it becomes even more of an issue for the president, given his personal history.
Speaking up about problems with the cult that is making war on us isn’t “Islamaphobia.” Fear to do so is.
This is a general problem of the Left, but it becomes even more of an issue for the president, given his personal history.
Speaking up about problems with the cult that is making war on us isn’t “Islamaphobia.” Fear to do so is.
Professor Foley has some thoughts on Senator Lee’s and Rep. Hensarling’s proposal.
And Mia Love wants to simplify legislation.
The latter is a great idea, but it’s going to be really hard to come up with a way to enforce single-issue that the porkers and get-along-to-go-alongers won’t find a way to circumvent.
It’s as broken as peer review.
As with civil (and military) space, we have a 20th-century system in place for the 21st century.
Update a few minutes later]
Related: Why scientists hide their doubts about global warming from the media.
[Update a cuple minutes later]
Sorry, HTML was broken for first link, should be fixed now.
When you say “the science is settled,” you are arguing for an end to your research funding.
Oops.
This is all part of the Democrats’ war on science:
Looking forward to a new U.S. President next year, whether the Democrats or the Republicans are in power, I don’t expect a continuation of the status quo on climate science funding. The Democrats are moving away from science towards policy – who needs to spend all that funding on basic climate science research? Global climate modeling might be ‘saved’ if they think these climate models can support local impact assessments (in spite of widespread acknowledgement that they cannot). If the Republicans are elected, Ted Cruz has stated he will stop all funding support for the IPCC and UNFCCC initiatives. That said, he seems to like data and basic scientific research.
Heh.
[Update a few minutes later]
“It’s a bit complicated.”
You don’t say.
Loren Grush has a good summary. Everyone recognizes that this is going nowhere, but the monster rocket people don’t care.
I think Phil Klein has it right on how Trump will end his candidacy.
This article at The Space Review seems profoundly ignorant of economics and history, including the history of the Moon Treaty, because that basically seems to be what he’s proposing.
…its water quality would be fine.
Government is just a word for things we do together, like charging city residents for toxic water that will cause permanent brain damage to their kids.
[Update a few minutes later]
Flint residents can’t sue the government. Unlike if the water company had been private like (say) General Motors. Isn’t that convenient?
Dale Skran critiques a strawmannish article from a few days ago, so I don’t have to.
A roundup of links and discussion of the latest in scientific “transparency.”
In my opinion, science that has any policy implications (I’m looking at you, climate and nutrition) has gone completely off the rails.