There is no innocent explanation for him to meet with the president:
I can’t for the life of me come up with any kind of innocent explanation for why Obama would have met with the Chief Counsel of the IRS. That meeting shouldn’t ever happen, and especially not without the Commissioner of the IRS being there. Presidents just don’t go to agency chief counsels with legal questions. Presidents don’t go to anyone with legal questions. Their staff does. The idea that the President would sit down with some random agency chief counsel and discuss some pressing legal issue is just bizarre to anyone who has worked in the legal field at that level. I am not sure the reporters covering this story understand how legal advice is actually delivered to the President and just how out of the ordinary that meeting was.
What should really concern the media, and would if they weren’t in the tank, is the number of things that they need to seek innocent explanations for in this administration.
Related: Does this scandal reach into the White House? We should hope so:
…the higher this scandal goes, the better it is for the country. We say that not because we don’t care for Barack Obama–let’s be honest, a President Biden would be no bargain either–but because the president can be held accountable if it turns out he or his top aides essentially instructed the IRS to steal the 2012 election. A corrupt administration can be dealt with, as Richard Nixon’s was 40 years ago.
By contrast, if career IRS employees acted on their own, it means the integrity of American democracy itself is threatened by an out-of-control administrative state. In that case, how to solve the problem is not at all clear.
It would require a complete overhaul and housecleaning of the federal establishment. In fact, I would propose not allowing federal employees to vote. They have too much power as it is, and a huge conflict of interest.