…on last night’s debate that I discussed (among other things) at the National Review this morning. Tea Party in Space responds.
[Update late evening]
As part of the Tea In Space article, Andrew has a very interesting chart.
…on last night’s debate that I discussed (among other things) at the National Review this morning. Tea Party in Space responds.
[Update late evening]
As part of the Tea In Space article, Andrew has a very interesting chart.
It really was a pathetic performance.
Is extreme bank regulation a key to the lousy economy? The fact that there’s a ton of uncertainty about Frank-Dodd doesn’t help, either. And of course, Sarbanes-Oxley has been a disaster for start ups.
I have some thoughts on last night’s surprise space policy discussion, over at National Review Online.
Many also can’t tell that you’re not a Syrian lesbian. Or is that a Lebanese sybian?
I am so confused.
Barack Obama: “If you’re looking for partisan rhetoric, I’m not your guy.”
Words fail. The frightening thing is, that he may actually be so self delusional as to believe it.
The topic of space actually came up in the Republican debate this evening. Jeff Foust has the story. It just demonstrates how unimportant the subject is, that no one on the panel other than Newt really knew anything about it. And what little they do know is undoubtedly wrong, given the abysmal media coverage of the topic for the last year and a half (if not forever).
…according to Bjørn Lomborg, a voice of sanity against the Malthusian humanity-hating watermelons. I’m a little surprised, actually, to see such a politically incorrect piece in Newsweak.
Matt Welch doesn’t have quite as much as Peter Beinart thinks he should. Me, neither.