Megan McArdle explains why even “liberals” should want to eliminate the corporate income tax. The reason that many will persist in disagreement is because they just might be Marxists.
[Update a few minutes later]
I would repeat the old aphorism: corporations don’t pay taxes; they only collect them, at a fairly high cost to economic growth.
I like this comment in Ron Radosh’s take-down of John Judis:
It would appear that while the American people want a new government, the Democrats would like a new people. Let’s see how that works out.
As another commenter points out, we know how that worked out for leftists in the past, in Germany and Russia. Not to mention Cambodia.
Jonah Goldberg’s Twitter feed is pretty funny. I like Nick Gillespie’s comment that it’s like a stage show at a water park. I’ll be curious to see how much of a mess they leave. They may be media savvy enough to clean up, though, given recent experience. This sounds about right, too:
Criticize the political content & you’re reminded it was a comedy show. Point out it wasn’t funny & you don’t have a sense of humor. Repeat.
I might have watched, but I think that space settlement is more important. Besides, the Spartan game took up all my multi-tasking capability. And I was at a secure undisclosed (well, unless you went to the SSI web site) location at NASA Ames Research Center, nowhere near a teevee.
A new historical revelation, which should surprise anyone who’s been paying attention:
Mr. Weber has discovered that, briefly at the turn of 1918-19, and unmentioned in “Mein Kampf,” Hitler wore a red brassard and supported the short-lived Bavarian Soviet Republic.
But remember, National Socialists are “right wing.”
We have to be careful to analyze our enemies in terms of their circumstances, not ours. An analogous mistake is made by those who claim Guantanamo Bay “causes” terrorism or materially contributes to terrorist recruitment; the jihadists themselves care only about the fact that we are detaining Muslims — they don’t care where, and they don’t have a clue or a care about the differences between military and civilian processes under U.S. law. Good intelligence requires taking the enemy on his own terms, not as we would think or act under the enemy’s circumstances.
This, in the context of whether or not the latest attempt had anything to do with the elections.
…and change! Almost half of Democrat voters think that Obama should have someone face him in a primary. I have mixed feelings about this. I think I want him on the ballot in 2012. But it would be nice to see him get beaten up, as happened to Jimmy Carter. Of course, people forget that there was a third candidate in that race. Whether or not that happens this time partially depends on whether the Republicans learned from their mistakes.
We have way too many people in prison. Particularly federal prison. Because we are all criminals, given the insanity of the current federal code. I can’t imagine that the Founders ever envisioned this. But that’s what happens when the Tenth Amendment becomes a dead letter.
Did the expenditure of Nancy’s cannon fodder represent the high-water mark for “progressivism”? I’d like to hope so, but I fear not.
The Rally To Restore Smugness is apparently stuff white people like. Plus, multiculturalism and sharia.
…but is Charlie Crist the most unprincipled politician in the land?
I’ll be happy to see a lot of people lose on Tuesday, but he’ll be in the top ten.