For left-wing nostalgiasts. As Michael Barone says, no matter how fervently they may wish it, Iraq is not Vietnam, “Plamegate” is not Watergate, and Bush is not Nixon redux.

For left-wing nostalgiasts. As Michael Barone says, no matter how fervently they may wish it, Iraq is not Vietnam, “Plamegate” is not Watergate, and Bush is not Nixon redux.

For left-wing nostalgiasts. As Michael Barone says, no matter how fervently they may wish it, Iraq is not Vietnam, “Plamegate” is not Watergate, and Bush is not Nixon redux.

Natalie Maines continues to inflict her ignorant political opinions on an indifferent world:

“The entire country may disagree with me, but I don’t understand the necessity for patriotism,” Maines resumes, through gritted teeth. “Why do you have to be a patriot? About what? This land is our land? Why? You can like where you live and like your life, but as for loving the whole country

Jonah Goldberg says that we should have installed liberalism in Iraq, not democracy. There is a confusion between the two, and as he points out, introducing democracy in an illiberal society will not necessarily provide helpful results.

…many on the left see no problem singing the praises of leftwing regimes which put “equality” ahead of democracy. As Derb once put it, “Wherever there is a jackboot stomping on a human face there will be a well-heeled Western liberal to explain that the face does, after all, enjoy free health care and 100 percent literacy.” But regimes which put liberty and the rule of law ahead of democracy and the like are always immediately derided as dictatorial “strong-man” regimes. I’m not saying that such criticism isn’t sometimes accurate. After all, democracy is good and tends to innoculate against tyranny and without democracy enlightened regimes often go bad. But I would still have preferred to live under Pinochet than Castro or Lee Kuan Yew instead of Hugo Chavez (or, heh, the Hapsburgs than the Soviets).

As someone who still considers himself a classical liberal, that makes a lot of sense to me, given the often ugly choices of the real (as opposed to ivory-tower) world. It’s easy to overrate and overemphasize democracy. As Churchill once said, it’s the worst possible system, except for all the others.

This anti-pork proposal by Frist is better than nothing, but I’d still like to see a sunset amendment (which would include sunsetting entitlements).

That’s common sense to most people who’ve been following this case, but it’s a shocking statement from an academic committee.

That’s common sense to most people who’ve been following this case, but it’s a shocking statement from an academic committee.

That’s common sense to most people who’ve been following this case, but it’s a shocking statement from an academic committee.

And the windmills aren’t even real. Speaking as a supposed skeptic about God (he’s actually an atheist–that is, someone who not only doesn’t believe in God, but who actually believes that there is no God), Michael Newdow is an idiot:

Michael Newdow, the Sacramento, California lawyer and doctor who had previously launched a court challenge on behalf of his daughter over the phrase “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance said in schools, had argued that “In God We Trust” on monetary instruments violates his rights.

Newdow claimed that by using coins and currency bearing the phrase, he is forced to carry religious dogma, proselytise and evangelise for monotheism.

He needs to get a life.