All I can say is “wow.”
Category Archives: Space
Bob Zimmerman
He’s newly published an old SF book.
SpaceX
Dick Eagleson writes that it’s about to eat its young.
If SpaceX's BFR works, RocketLab, VirginOrbit, and the vast majority of other smallsat launchers will disappear because they're expendable.
— Chris (Robotbeat)??? (@Robotbeat) October 3, 2017
SpaceX (and Blue Origin) are the asteroid heading for the space industry dinosaurs. https://t.co/mf4uPsLNpp
— Rand Simberg (@Rand_Simberg) October 3, 2017
Elon’s Mars Plans
He’s going to announce changes from last year’s plans tonight at 21:30 PDT (tomorrow afternoon in Adelaide). It will be streamed.
[Update early afternoon]
The liberating effects of retiring from NASA: Former astronaut Terry Virts is criticizing Deep Space Gateway and SLS/Orion. Combined with Elon’s pending announcement, Marshall (and Shelby) can’t be happy.
[Update a few minutes later]
Chris Bergin:
Blimey. Terry Virts going negative on SLS and DSG….on the eve of Elon announcing an SLS-class subscale BFR that Marshall folk have been going to great pains to say isn't a SLS-rival, but a potential colleague. https://t.co/wNbWCmnObg
— Chris B – NSF (@NASASpaceflight) September 28, 2017
[Update mid-afternoon]
Bob Zimmerman has some thoughts on Lockheed Martin’s DSG and Mars plans:
All these public relations announcements suggest to me that the Trump administration is getting close to unveiling its own future space policy, and they all suggest that this policy will be to build a space station around the Moon. My guess is that Lockheed Martin and SpaceX are vying for a piece of that pie in their announcements today.
Let me also note that Lockheed Martin’s concept above illustrates nicely what a lie Orion is and has always been. They have been touting it for years as the vehicle that will get Americans to Mars, but now admit that it can only really be a small part of a much larger interplanetary ship, and will be there mostly to be the descent capsule when astronauts want to come home. They also admit in the video at the first link that their proposal for getting to Mars is only a concept. To build it would require many billions of dollars. I wonder will it as much as Orion and SLS ($43 billion plus) and take as long (18 years plus) to build? If so, it is a bad purchase. We can do this faster, and for less.
But there are insufficient opportunities for graft in that.
[Update a couple minutes later]
Lockmart reveals its refuelable reusable lander. Looks like initial plan is to fuel in orbit, though, not on the surface. And of course:
While it is unclear whether NASA’s Deep Space Gateway mission will include landing on the moon, Lockheed Martin said its lander would also be capable of a lunar mission if required.
It’s a dessert topping and a floor wax.
[Update a few minutes later]
Watch the Lockmart presentation live, when it starts in a few minutes.
[Friday-morning update]
OK, so I guess the big news is that he thinks he can pay for it with point-to-point rocket trips. Briefly (for now), I’m skeptical.
[Update a while later]
Here‘s Eric Berger’s take on it. Yes, he’s recognizing that the near-term government market is more likely to be the moon than Mars.
[Update a few minutes later]
Here‘s Jeff Foust’s report from Adelaide.
[Update a while later]
Clark Lindsey has videos.
[Update mid morning]
Ken Chang and Adam Baidawi say that the financials are “murky.” Well, yeah. As is the regulatory situation.
[Update a few more minutes later]
[Update a while later]
Scott Manley analyzes it.
[Update a few more minutes later]
Bob Zimmerman, in response to Chris Gebhart’s write up, says that BFR is an affordable version of SLS. Except that it doesn’t satisfy the primary requirement of SLS, which is to keep Huntsville and the Cape rolling in taxpayer dough.
[Monday-morning update]
The non-technical hurdles for Elon’s plans.
[Bumped]
“The Lieutenant Wouldn’t Like It”
Sarah Hoyt writes about growing up a child of Heinlein.
Wrong Theories In Physics
Chad Orzel asks, what is the greatest one?
Elon’s Mars Plans
He plans to follow up from last year’s talk in Guadalajara with an update in Adelaide on Friday. Eric Berger wonders if he’ll explain how he’s going to pay for it. Me too.
[Update a couple minutes later]
Loren Grush has some questions, too. I guess we’ll find out Thursday night.
Writing The Future
Over at The Weekly Standard, I remember Jerry Pournelle:
…he had an outsized influence on U.S. space and defense policy. In the late 1970s and early ’80s, he and others would gather at Niven’s home in Tarzana, California, to hammer out policy recommendations. These meetings evolved into something more formal, the Citizens’ Advisory Council on National Space Policy, which Pournelle chaired. In addition to several science fiction authors, the group included Buzz Aldrin and a handful of other astronauts, retired military officers like Army General Danny Graham, and several figures from the aerospace industry. (I was too junior to be invited, but my then-boss at the Aerospace Corporation participated.) Congressman Newt Gingrich was involved, too. The group recommended to Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger the commencement of a missile-defense program, a proposal that helped inspire President Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative in 1983. To the extent that the prospect of American missile-defense technology hastened the end of the Cold War—by making it plain to Soviet leaders that mutually assured destruction would no longer be mutual—Pournelle can be said to have played a small but not insignificant part in nudging the world toward freedom.
RTWT, despite the fact that I wrote it.
Bridenstine
Eric Berger says he’s likely to be approved as NASA administrator.
[Thursday-morning update]
Buzz Aldrin and Greg Autry: It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to run NASA.
A Private Chinese Space Company
…wants to emulate SpaceX. I take this much more seriously than anything the Chinese government claims to plan.