…and it’s acting weird.
With modern technology, and a soft grid, another Carrington event would be a societal disaster.
…and it’s acting weird.
With modern technology, and a soft grid, another Carrington event would be a societal disaster.
This one has some spoilers.
Stephen Clark has an intense first-hand account over at Spaceflight Now.
Michael Belfiore has a piece at Popular Mechanics, quoting me, and over at The Atlantic is one by Michael Lemonick (I haven’t read the latter yet).
SciAm has a list of all the recent launch failures.
Note that for the past three and a half years, every single one (including last night’s) was built in Russia or the Ukraine. And the last two American ones (not counting last night’s) were both Orbital (separation problem on Taurus). Prior to that, the last American one was the Falcon 1 test program, which should really count, since it was in fact a test program. Orbital has no experience with liquid propulsion, which is why they outsourced it to Ukraine. That appears to have been a mistake.
[Update a while later]
Orbital’s stock is down 17% this morning.
[Update a while later, just before Atlas V launch]
Eric Berger’s thoughts on the implications. I agree that it’s not that big a deal, but I hope it accelerates and end to our reliance on Russian hardware.
Orbital just had a very bad day.
[Update a while later]
You’ve probably seen the news all over by now, but here’s a spectator video [language warning]
[Update about 6 PDT]
Here’s another one, from a plane.
[Tuesday-morning update]
Christopher Nolan’s epic new sci-fi film Interstellar has received measured acclaim from critics, who have praised its ambitious scale and effects but were less convinced about the story.
That was the problem with Gravity, too.
[Bumped]
An article at Technology Review about Elon’s plans for next year.
Why it’s doomed to fail?
It’s never looked technically/economically realistic to me.
They just scrubbed the Antares launch of Cygnus to ISS, because the range was red due to a boat downrange. Am I the only person who thinks that this rule is stupid, and needs to be revised? As I said on Twitter, I don’t care if there’s an armada of boats in the box, as long as someone is flying a banner “AT OWN RISK.” Holding up a flight over this is insane. It’s the kind of hypercaution that keeps us from making more rapid progress in space.