…is still not understood.
[Update Friday afternoon]
The latest SLS follies: This isn’t insane at all.
…is still not understood.
[Update Friday afternoon]
The latest SLS follies: This isn’t insane at all.
My business associate and former XCOR employee Dale Amon is doing an equity crowdfunding on his company in Las Cruces.
As with the Nanoracks/Lockmart one, there is no discussion of orbital location. It looks like Sierra has decided to team up.
[Tuesday-morning update]
OK, here’s a description from NASA Spaceflight. They clearly want to be co-orbital with ISS, but they say that they’ll be at a higher altitude. That doesn’t make sense, because if they aren’t at the same altitude, the nodes are going to drift apart and while they’ll be at the same inclination, they will be in a different orbit plane. They should be leading or trailing it at the same altitude if they want to stay co-planar.
This is interesting. I wonder what orbit it will be in? I’d think they’d want to be co-orbital with ISS.
I’ll trade options on that stock, but I wouldn’t buy and hold.
Will they ever be safe? As the analysis indicates, it all comes down to propulsion reliability. I think they can get there.
Jonathan McDowell’s current take (mostly questions).
[Tuesday-morning update]
Thoughts from Bob Zimmerman.
We now have a transcript.
The trip wasn’t long enough for Sian Proctor.
I always find it amusing when people project their own lack of interest in space to denigrate the notion that there is a market for space travel.
[Afternoon update]
Thoughts on his upcoming trip to space, from Chris Boshuizen.