Denounced a decade ago as a misguided effort to find “little green men” and cut off from government funding, SETI, which stands for search for extraterrestrial intelligence, has found a new following among Silicon Valley titans and techies elsewhere who are interested in space. They have infused the institute with money and unconventional technical ideas, bringing a new respect and energy to the organization. Some argue that being cast away by the federal government was the best thing that could have happened to SETI, that it has become stronger and more innovative in the private sector than it ever could have as part of a public bureaucracy.
More of this, please, particularly for human spaceflight.
Denounced a decade ago as a misguided effort to find “little green men” and cut off from government funding, SETI, which stands for search for extraterrestrial intelligence, has found a new following among Silicon Valley titans and techies elsewhere who are interested in space. They have infused the institute with money and unconventional technical ideas, bringing a new respect and energy to the organization. Some argue that being cast away by the federal government was the best thing that could have happened to SETI, that it has become stronger and more innovative in the private sector than it ever could have as part of a public bureaucracy.
More of this, please, particularly for human spaceflight.
Denounced a decade ago as a misguided effort to find “little green men” and cut off from government funding, SETI, which stands for search for extraterrestrial intelligence, has found a new following among Silicon Valley titans and techies elsewhere who are interested in space. They have infused the institute with money and unconventional technical ideas, bringing a new respect and energy to the organization. Some argue that being cast away by the federal government was the best thing that could have happened to SETI, that it has become stronger and more innovative in the private sector than it ever could have as part of a public bureaucracy.
More of this, please, particularly for human spaceflight.
…that seems to be having problems with dodgy procurement practices. OSC may be in trouble as well.
Orbital said an investigation led by the U.S. attorney’s office in Phoenix appears to be focusing on “contracting procedures” related to “certain U.S. government launch vehicle programs.”
…that seems to be having problems with dodgy procurement practices. OSC may be in trouble as well.
Orbital said an investigation led by the U.S. attorney’s office in Phoenix appears to be focusing on “contracting procedures” related to “certain U.S. government launch vehicle programs.”
…that seems to be having problems with dodgy procurement practices. OSC may be in trouble as well.
Orbital said an investigation led by the U.S. attorney’s office in Phoenix appears to be focusing on “contracting procedures” related to “certain U.S. government launch vehicle programs.”
Florida Today makes a rampant speculation, unsupported by anything, apparently, other than the fevered imaginations of its editors:
In case you missed it, NASA’s former chief Sean O’Keefe killed the [Hubble] mission in 2004, citing post-Columbia safety concerns. More likely, that was just a cover story to start redirecting money for the agency’s moon-Mars plans.
No, more likely it was exactly what O’Keefe said, and no evidence has ever been produced to indicate otherwise. It was a dumb decision, and O’Keefe should have stepped down much sooner, because it was quite clear that he no longer had the stomach for the job post-Columbia, but it had nothing to do with the VSE. As Keith Cowing says, if they don’t have any actual basis for this statement, they shouldn’t be making it.
Robert Zimmerman says that we’re on the verge of a new renaissance in space exploration, with an explosion of creativity partly fueled by the new media.
Jeff Foust has an extensive description of Virgin Galactic’s plans, based on Will Whitehorn’s talk at last week’s ISDC:
Virgin is open to other uses of suborbital spaceflight, such as point-to-point transportation, although Whitehorn noted that they are not actively pursuing it because they would then be treated as an airline from a regulatory standpoint, with strict limitations on the flights that a foreign-owned airline can offer in the US. Instead, Virgin is looking at the possibility of orbital spaceflight.