Category Archives: Technology and Society

Business, Economics, Media Criticism, Political Commentary, Popular Culture, Space, Technology and Society

Just A Right-Wing Fantasy

5 Comments

No, of course Atlas Shrugged has nothing to do with life in modern America:

Ah, that must be the Anti Dog-Eat-Dog Law, or one of the Fairness Laws, or something, right? The WSJ isn’t sure what law the NLRB is talking about, either. Not only do businesses routinely relocate to find the most advantageous environment possible, states and cities compete for that business by calculating their business climate. If this has escaped the notice of the NLRB, perhaps they should get out more.

This will be an important court case, assuming it’s fought. Then again, it’s hard to feel too bad for Boeing — as Mickey says, live by crony capitalism, die by crony capitalism. Sadly, we’ve also seen this sort of corporatism/fascism wasting our space dollars as well, in addition to inhibiting innovation.

Business, Economics, Political Commentary, Technology and Society

China’s Train Wreck

14 Comments

High-speed rail in China isn’t all it’s cracked up to be:

Liu’s legacy, in short, is a system that could drain China’s economic resources for years. So much for the grand project that Thomas Friedman of the New York Times likened to a “moon shot” and that President Obama held up as a model for the United States.

Rather than demonstrating the advantages of centrally planned long-term investment, as its foreign admirers sometimes suggested, China’s bullet-train experience shows what can go wrong when an unelected elite, influenced by corrupt opportunists, gives orders that all must follow — without the robust public discussion we would have in the states.

And where we have robust discussion, it gets canceled (as in Florida). Unfortunately, the discussion in California hasn’t yet been sufficiently robust.

Political Commentary, Social Commentary, Technology and Society

Fake Animal Cruelty

23 Comments

Jonah Goldberg has some thoughts on vegan diets and their attempts at meat simulation:

…if one is to take the arguments of the ethical vegans at face value, isn’t it a bit disgusting or immoral to make products that look like the foods they consider most evil? Fake hamburgers are really a marvel, but while they still come up short on the taste front, they certainly look like hamburgers. If meat is murder, why hawk products that look like the mutilated corpse? Consider our views on cannibalism, then imagine selling faux human flesh in, say, the form of human thumbs — “It tastes just like a missionary!” Wouldn’t that still be in poor taste?

Technology advances are going to make this even more complicated in the future. I suspect that at some point cloning technology will enable us to grow meat in a vat, and probably pretty good-tasting meat at that. What does this do to the vegan argument against animal cruelty? Or to extend Jonah’s example, if we could grow long pork without harming any sentient humans in the process, would it be wrong to eat it? Should it be illegal? For that matter, would it really be human flesh? If so, what would make it that — just the DNA content of the cells?

This seems similar to child pr0n, in that one has to separate the act of consumption from the act of production. It’s pretty clearly wrong to produce child pr0n using actual children, but if it’s computer animated, who does it hurt? Yes, I understand the argument that we should discourage the consumption as well, lest it lead to a demand for supply, though I don’t think that the Supreme Court agrees. But how many vegans would eat animal flesh if it weren’t produced from whole animals with brains and nervous systems? Judging by the repeated attempts to replicate the carnivorous experience from vegetation, quite a number, I’d imagine.