Found on Facebook, and just what I’ve been thinking.

…it’s that we can’t trust these people.

For instance, how hard would it be to search the metadata to find out who attended Tea Party rallies?

[Update late morning]

Hey, gun grabbers? This is why we don’t want you to know what guns we have. If you don’t have a list, we don’t have to worry about you abusing it.

Susan “Youtube” Rice?!!!

Is this the most politically tone-deaf administration in history?

And do they really think that throwing Donilon under the bus is going to make Benghazi go away?

I feel much more secure now that we have a security advisor who doesn’t know the difference between a terrorist attack and a rambunctious movie review.

[Afternoon update]

“Not one, not two, but three flips of the Obama bird:

Susan Rice is no more qualified to opine on matters of national security than a character from The Wizard of Oz. Like Obama himself, she is a highly politicized, over-credentialed Scarecrow, with certificates from Stanford, Oxford, and the Brookings Institution in place of a brain.

He’s being kind, I think.

[Update a few minutes later]

OK, per comments here and elsewhere, how can the administration prevent her from testifying on executive privilege when the thing that she will be testifying about occurred when she was working for the State Department?

OK, let me amend that. How can they credibly do so?

Not that that ever slows them down, either, of course. It didn’t with Holder in Fast and Furious.

And then there’s this. Maybe Bob-1 is right in comments (hey, you know, blind squirrels and all) and it’s not Donilon that’s becoming a bus speed bump:

As for birds two and three, I’ll leave it to my PJ colleagues to unpack the implicit antisemitic and anti-Israel nature of the Power appointment; the Irish-born Ms. Power is married to Harvard egghead Cass Sunstein, proving once again that leftists, like rock stars and supermodels, tend to travel in packs and marry each other because they never meet anybody else. But surely Hillary Clinton, who’s clearly now being fitted for the fall guy jacket regarding Benghazi, must be seething.

Keep the corn popper on standby.

His head-in-the-sand speech.

That’s a more polite way of describe the location of his noggin than the one I’d use. Only a fool thinks that you can end a war unilaterally.

…against Al Qaeda?

OK, so, ignoring the fact that this goes against the president’s reelection narrative, please explain how it ends.

The video magically appeared between edits two and three:

That’s when the video became the deus ex machina, the soon-to-be-visible hand of the bag of lies dumped on the electorate to prevent us from seeing the catastrophe of the Obama appeasement of radical Islam — a.k.a. “leading with the behind.” Saying “attacks” would have automatically put the Benghazi events in the context of the (banned concept) war against terror, whereas ”demonstrations” shifted the context — the whole Arab Spring thing consisted of lots of demonstrations, and the Obama crowd was basically pro-demonstration.

Indeed, Hillary Clinton and Susan Rice justified the demonstrations. How? By blaming them on the video. More evidence that the invisible video was hidden in the third edit.

You can tell they were scrambling to try to save the campaign narrative.

…and Libya falls apart.