OK, only one model has it going to New Orleans. Let’s hope that the consensus of the other models is right, and it’s heading for Mexico.
Or maybe Karl Rove is just revving up his black-killing weather machine one more time, for old time’s sake.
Risk And Adversity
Katherine Mangu-Ward compares and contrasts NASA’s safety approach to that of private industry.
Don’t Know Much About ‘Rithmatick
…at the New York Times.
Don’t Know Much About ‘Rithmatick
…at the New York Times.
Don’t Know Much About ‘Rithmatick
…at the New York Times.
Be Sure To Wear Extra-Baggy Pants
“Doug From Upland” has a request of Sandy Berger:
Do you think you could take the time to go to the Clinton Library to review all of the documents? If you are able to fit that into your schedule, we will trust your judgment in determining which are most important for the American people to see before the next presidential election.
Because I doubt that the security will be as intense as at the National Archives, I am hoping that you will be able to stuff them into your pants, take them out of the building, and leave them under a travel trailer near the site. I will provide the location of the travel trailer when I hear from you that you will be able to perform this act of patriotism.
Sorry About That
A tribe of cannibals has apologized for eating Methodist missionaries.
All right, then, but don’t do it again.
Is There An Aerodynamicist In The House?
XCOR needs one.
And once again, ITAR rears its ugly head.
A Heretical Thought
You know, I think that there are Democrats that could win the presidency next year. But I don’t think that any of them are in the race, or if they are, they have no chance of being nominated.
To Repair Or Not To Repair?
Tariq Malik has a good story on the current state of the Shuttle tile issue.
Apparently, the concern is not for loss of the vehicle (and of course, the crew, but we have lots of astronauts*, and only three orbiters left). The concern is whether or not a repair will reduce the turnaround time for repair on the ground that’s worth the risk (to both crew doing EVA and the vehicle, in the event they actually make things worse by dinging it somewhere else or botching the repair) of attempting to repair it.
I don’t have access to all the data, but I’d be inclined to come in as is, assuming that it really doesn’t risk vehicle loss.
Someone on a mailing list I’m on noted that they wouldn’t want to be the person who signed off on a return without a repair. As I commented there, there are risks either way. If they attempt to repair it, and lose the vehicle on entry, it would be easy to second guess the decision, and decide after the fact that the repair caused the loss, whereas leaving it alone might have brought them home all right.
There are no risk-free decisions. Every action in life, every breath you take, is a gamble. It’s just a matter of judging the odds.
[Friday morning update]
Sorry, Keith, but it wasn’t a joke. It’s a description of reality. I know that you have trouble with that sometimes.
[Monday morning update]
In rereading Keith’s strange comment, I have no idea what he’s talking about here:
…to make sure to get a link to a drunk astronaut story in the process.
The only story I linked (other than Tariq Malik’s) to was one about Lisa Nowak, the main point of which was that NASA has too many astronauts. Reading is fundamental.
* Of course, the fact that we’d lose Barbara Morgan, the other “teacher in space” (quotes because she’s officially an astronaut) would have dire PR effects.