I learned a lot about it that I hadn’t known before. But then, I’ve never seen the movie, for two reasons. First, it had John Travolta in it. Second, it was chock full of disco, which I’ve long thought a tool of the devil, and did at the time. Like rap, I’ve never had much interest in music in which the drums (and occasionally bass) carried the melody. Also, as many have since noted, it destroyed vibrancy of the club scene for years, when it was a lot easier and cheaper to hire a deejay with his disco records than a live band. And because
of that, despite his rave review, I think I’ll continue to remain an SNF virgin.
I learned a lot about it that I hadn’t known before. But then, I’ve never seen the movie, for two reasons. First, it had John Travolta in it. Second, it was chock full of disco, which I’ve long thought a tool of the devil, and did at the time. Like rap, I’ve never had much interest in music in which the drums (and occasionally bass) carried the melody. Also, as many have since noted, it destroyed vibrancy of the club scene for years, when it was a lot easier and cheaper to hire a deejay with his disco records than a live band. And because
of that, despite his rave review, I think I’ll continue to remain an SNF virgin.
I get a little tired of hearing all the whining from Democrats and other faux defenders of civil liberties over how we treat terror suspects, when the War on (Some) Drugs has had far greater atrocities on civil liberties, like this one, described by Radley Balko, for decades now, and for a much less worthy cause. The cynicism and corruption that this has generated in the nation’s police departments and federal enforcement agencies, as they make war on their own citizens, is frightening, and its depth unknown.
As Glenn says, I’d take the Dems more seriously if they’d denounce this war, which truly is “failed,” a “quagmire,” and one that we have “lost.” But that would take political courage.
Amir Tehari asks the obvious question of Harry Reid–if we’ve lost the war, who won?
Because all wars have winners and losers, Reid, having identified America as the loser, is required to name the winner. This Reid cannot do.
The reason is that, whichever way one looks at the situation, America and its Iraqi allies remain the only objective victors in this war…
…Reid may believe that Iran, either alone or with its Syrian Sancho Panza, is the victor. If that’s the case, Reid shares the illusion peddled by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Convinced that the Americans will run away, mostly thanks to political maneuvers by Reid and his friends, Ahmadinejad has gone on the offensive in Iraq and throughout the region. By heightening his profile, he wants to make sure that Iran reaps the fruits of what Reid is sowing in Washington.
But even then, it’s unlikely that most Iraqis would acknowledge Ahmadinejad as winner and bow to his diktat. The Islamic Republic cannot act as victor solely because Reid says so.
It’s possible that Reid imagined that his analytical problems are over simply because he has identified the war’s loser. The truth is that his troubles are only beginning. He must tell Americans to whom they wish their army to surrender in Iraq.
I never bought the cell phone theory, anyway. I know that those things have been getting smaller and smaller, but I don’t know how they would have gotten the bees to use them, or sign up for a twelve-month plan.
I never bought the cell phone theory, anyway. I know that those things have been getting smaller and smaller, but I don’t know how they would have gotten the bees to use them, or sign up for a twelve-month plan.
I never bought the cell phone theory, anyway. I know that those things have been getting smaller and smaller, but I don’t know how they would have gotten the bees to use them, or sign up for a twelve-month plan.
