Political Commentary

An Interesting Idea

Jonah Goldberg proposes a return of a Vatican army:

I’m not saying they should use an army for crusades for new lands or for conversion or anything like that. But why shouldn’t the Catholic Church have peacekeepers of its own? The use of force isn’t forbidden by Catholic law, I know that much. And the Swiss Guards still have weapons even on Vatican property. Why couldn’t the Pope dispatch armed soldiers to restore order, open food supplies, secure humaintarian efforts etc?

It couldn’t be worse than one under the command of the UN.

[Update at 2:21 PM EDT]

How would one amend the Treaty of Westphalia? Other than Great Britain, are the sovereign entities that signed it even in existence any more? Who (other than perhaps Italy) would object, and have legitimate grounds to, if the Vatican decided to build up, and utilize, the Swiss Guard? Of course, given the paucity of real estate they have, their biggest problem would be finding a place to house the Pope’s divisions. Though I hear there are some military bases being freed up in Germany…

War Commentary

Not In My Name

Apparently, many families with members serving in Iraq aren’t as impressed with Mother Sheehan as the MSM seems to be. And seems to want us to be.

[9 AM EDT Update]

Here’s a specific grieving father who says that Cindy Sheehan doesn’t speak for him. Does he (in defiance of the meaning of the word “absolute”) have less “absolute moral authority” than she does, Maureen? Or is it only grieving parents who are opposed to the war, and think that Bush did it for oil and imperialism, and is waging a nuclear war in Iraq, and should be impeached, who have that quality?

And he makes an excellent point. If, as she says, the moral authority of parents whose offspring (and no, they’re not children, despite your and others’ attempt to infantilize them for political purposes) are killed in Iraq is truly absolute, how does she reconcile these apparently conflicting views?

[Update at 11:40 AM EDT]

Mark Steyn has further related thoughts at The Spectator (registration required).

Space

Wring It Out

There was a bit of discussion about dry launch in the space blogosphere in the last day or two. It seems to have started with Jon Goff’s piece at Selenian Boondocks, which Clark Lindsey picked up and expanded on (see the “Fueling a Space Town” post), and was followed up with a post on agile space development by Dan Scrimpsher.

This is an important topic, and I wish that there was some sign that the new management at NASA is paying attention to it.

I would also add, as a response to the commenter who asks in Jon’s comments section, why deliver propellant that has to be transferred as a fluid on orbit, rather than easier-to-handle propellant tanks? It’s because delivering tanks doesn’t offer the possibility of refueling them on orbit, so they’d only be single use. And in-space refueling is a critical technology in becoming a truly space-faring civilization, and the sooner we get on with developing and becoming comfortable with it, the sooner we’ll reach that desirable (at least to me) destination.

[Update at 9 AM EDT]

I was imprecise above. As Paul Dietz points out in comments, delivering tanks doesn’t preclude the possibility of refueling them later, but that wasn’t what the the commenter was suggesting. What I should have said is that it doesn’t advance us toward that (in my opinion) worthy goal, and it was clear from the commenter’s question that he didn’t have in mind tanks designed to be refueled (and it is a significant design issue).

[One more update]

I should have written “…preclude us from refueling from them later,” to respond to Paul’s most recent comment about mischaracterizing what he said.

War Commentary

Huh?

Apparently, Senator Feingold is going to call for a fixed date to remove troops from Iraq. This idea has been amply discussed in the blogosphere (short version of the criticism–it allows the “insurgents” to run out the clock, after which they can have their way with the Iraqis). But I need this explained to me:

Media Criticism

An Amazing Thing

This ought to be framed, or perhaps displayed in a museum. It’s a (truly, perhaps in the best sense of the word) liberal reporter who actually seems to live up to the (usually absurd) claim that his politics don’t affect his reporting. He actually saw something wrong with the Al Franken gang diverting funds from poor children to their failed escapade. Can you imagine?

And his band of brothers in the press attempted to steal the story from him:

Last week Executive Editor Michael Horowitz called in to conservative radio host Sean Hannity

Weird

An Egyptian Secret Weapon?

Charles Lurio writes that they’ve apparently cloned Yasser Arafat:

Clearly the Islamo-fascists have a new weapon: cloning with quick forced fetus development. Take a look at the guy in the lower right of this pic from a NYTimes article on p3 yesterday about the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.

On the one hand they did improve him a bit: he’s not bald, as Arafat was under his kaffiyah. On the other, he’s clearly grown old too quickly once out of the womb, no doubt because they couldn’t turn off the accelerated development gene.

Or maybe it’s genetic damage from the laser poisoning.

Media Criticism

Just Stab Them, Dammit!

I’ve kvetched in the past about needlessly stupid things in science-fiction movies (needlessly in that they don’t even advance the plot, or necessarily add to the drama). Well, here’s someone who thinks the same thing about cinematic swordplay.

If the purpose of lightsaber fight choreography is simply to convey drama and excitement within the context of a story, then choreographers feel they’ve done their job well. But, from my point of view, if a lightsaber fight is supposed to convince the viewer that individuals of great skill are really trying to kill one another with laser swords while using supernatural powers that heighten their senses and physical abilities, well, they fail miserably.

[via Geek Press]

Biting Commentary about Infinity…and Beyond!