Interesting Spam

I just got the following email from a “Joe Wander” (joe_1der@hotmail.com)

Hello There,

I hope this email finds you well. My name is Joseph Wander and I am an Advertising Coordinator for an Internet Company. I am currently working on increasing our products and services presence on the internet. I came across your site and found it to be very useful. I am very much interested in advertising my product on www.interglobal.org/weblog/ and any others that may be part of your network.

We can pay you $20/month for 2 static text links or if you already have your media kit or advertising rates I will appreciate it if you can send it to me. Thank you again and I hope to hear from you soon.

Best Wishes,
Joseph Wander

It’s clear that he hasn’t actually visited my site. At least there’s nothing in the email to indicate that–it reads like a form letter. Note that it doesn’t address me by name. Also note that the email address is hotmail.

Any other bloggers out there gotten one of these, and do you have any idea what the deal (or catch) is? I’m hesitant to reply, because it may just be confirming my email address to a spamlist.

FAA vs FAA

Mitchell Burnside Clapp, of Pioneer Rocketplane, has started an interesting discussion on regulatory issues for space transports over at sci.space.policy.

I respond, as well as Henry Spencer (and Dan DeLong, Chief Engineer of XCOR). And no, I don’t really think that Mitchell is an ignorant slut…

And for those interested in this issue in the DC area, there’s a meeting on the subject of suborbital spaceflight on Capitol Hill tomorrow. The public is invited, and you can listen in on the web via a link at the Pro-Space site.

The Wacky Ninth Circuit Strikes Again

They’ve (temporarily) postponed the recall election until March, prolonging the circus and giving Davis a much better shot, by having his fate decided by hordes of Democratic primary voters. It’s another attack of the chads!

We’ll see if the SCOTUS weighs in to preempt this nonsense.

[Update at 2 PM PDT]

The ever-perspicacious Eugene Volokh asks a great question:

Assuming that punch card ballots are generally less reliable than the alternatives, why should we think that using punch card ballots in several counties in Oct. 2003 would be less reliable than using the alternatives for the fist time in those counties in Mar. 2004?

Biting Commentary about Infinity…and Beyond!