A Classic Of The Genre

…of space economics fallacies, the topic of my panel discussion at Space Access on Friday night:

…did you ever think about what is involved in presenting anything to the general public? When is the last time you purchased, studied, or otherwise became interested in a subject that was not in some way advertised to you? I would say, “never”. The time, and sometimes dollar, investments are heavy, but necessary if there is anything worthwhile to say. Getting information out to people costs a lot, but the return will, hopefully, be worth it. How? In terms of public support for the program, backed up with funding to make it possible. This, in turn, provides jobs for engineers, scientists, and, well, you. They, subsequently, provide jobs and income for car salesmen, lawyers, doctors, service providers, restaurant owners, teachers, website owners, and all who get pieces of the income spent by the space workers.

Yes, it’s all about job creation. Who cares if anything useful is accomplished, or wealth created?

This (flawed) argument would apply to any government program–there’s nothing unique about NASA with regard to it. I beat this one to a pulp a few years ago, but people still fall prey to it.