Space Nuclear Waste Disposal

When I wrote that piece about Three-Mile Island the other week, I forgot to mention my own recollections of the event. It was interesting timing, because it happened in the middle of a senior space systems engineering project that I was involved with at the University of Michigan. It was an annual course taught in the Aerospace Engineering department, required for Aerospace majors, which I took as an elective (though it wasn’t my major, I took many courses there, including several graduate ones, tailoring my own astronautical engineering degree, but without the emphasis on aeronautics). The course was taught by Harm Buning (who died only three years ago — I really ought to write about him some time). The project was to figure out how to dispose of nuclear waste in space. This was a couple years before the Shuttle had its first flight, and we still believed the hype about its cost and safety, so it was the assumed launch vehicle, but the question was what to do with the stuff once it was in LEO.

Having been pretty heavily involved with the L-5 Society (I had actually spent a semester the previous year volunteering at the HQ in Tucson, and had met people involved with the MIT mass driver work, including Henry Kolm and Eric Drexler — the people in that now-classic picture are, from right to left, a twenty-four year-old bearded Eric wearing a Maxwell’s equations teeshirt (one of which I also had at the time), Henry, Gerry O’Neill, someone unknown to me, and Kevin Fine — geek and space enthusiast city — I could write a sad book titled “We Were Space Enthusiasts, And Young…), I suggested that we use a linear synchronous motor to propel it out of the solar system. The class adopted the idea, and we came up with a crude systems design (about what you could expect from college seniors for such a complex project). It was in the middle of the project that TMI occurred, making it seem even more relevant.

The university seems to have put many of these older (typed by department secretaries– no word processors back then) reports on line, including this one. I’m sure I have a dead-tree copy somewhere, but it’s nice to see it on the web. It’s been a long time, and I was distracted at the time because my father had his second heart attack in April of that year, and died a few weeks later. Due to time missed, I had to finish up my sections early in the summer to avoid an Incomplete for the course, so I don’t remember how much of it and which parts I wrote, but it was quite a bit of it (at least the orbital mechanics and the dynamics of the payloads in the accelerator, and how much wall play they would have to have). Dave Steigmann wrote a lot of the structures section, I think. The report says that it’s authored by Kevin Blankinship, but he was probably just final editor, because he was officially the team project manager. One of the things that this course taught was not just engineering, but how to work as an engineering team (including managing with the politics and personal interactions). These were…interesting. I won’t say any more than that, to protect the guilty, whoever they all may be. 😉

Anyway, is it feasible? Probably not, but it was a good project for the purpose of learning how to consider all aspects of a space system, and project teamwork.

[Update a while later]

The project name was pretty good acronymery. I don’t recall whether it was mine, someone else’s, or the result of a brainstorming session. But it was Project NEWDUMP (Nuclear Energy Waste Disposal Using Mass-Driver Propulsion).

For anyone who is willing to read the thing, it is probably entertainingly rife with howlers, from the perspective of three decades later. This one on page four jumped off the page at me:

The Space Shuttle has substantially reduced the cost of space transportation since the Apollo project, with possible improvements for further economy.

Note the tense, and not also that this was written about two years before first flight.

6 thoughts on “Space Nuclear Waste Disposal”

  1. Wow – interesting seeing Dave Steigmann’s name come up. He was my solid mechanics prof when I was an undergrad at University of Alberta. I loved his course – always lots of interesting references to aerospace structures.

  2. I was at the first public (or was it the first?) demo of the mass driver 1, intentionally held on April 12th.

    Years ago I would have been able to name the guy second from the left, but not any more…

  3. The name “NEWDUMP” came from Dennis Melvin. I wasn’t enamored with the name myself, but Harm Buning wanted to make sure everyone was able to contribute.

    Rand was project engineer for the activity, and the mass-driver was his idea. The idea for nuclear waste disposal as the course topic was mine. Rand was right for the most part about my editorial role, but I did write the attitude control section.

    If I had to do the senior design over again, I would have stressed more that the environment simulate what is found in the actual industrial/governmental workplace. In the senior design course, leaders were elected, and that is not the best way to do it. Better to find those who have a talent for business. Nowadays, I could talk with a student for less than an hour and find out whether he/she has the right stuff for management. A stress on the business aspects would also have been more useful – programmatics, communication, problem-solving, quality.

    Another would have been determination of criteria to determine whether an idea was feasible or not. We never really took account of gravity gradient in our approach, although we analyzed for it. In hindsight, this would have shaped the design.

    Michigan does their senior spacecraft design course a lot differently nowadays, with more emphasis on design and fabrication of micro-satellites, as part of multi-year projects. This is perhaps a better way of doing education, as people would have a chance to acquire more technical knowledge.

  4. Thanks, Kevin. I agree with all of that.

    And isn’t the Internet great? We ought to get Lynne Wainfan, Dave Steigmann and others, and have an on-line reunion.

Comments are closed.