St. Elizabeth

I’ve never been as impressed by Elizabeth Edwards as the media has wanted me to be (of course, the gulf between my perception of John Edwards and the media’s desires has been even wider). Kaus says that the media continues to be too soft on her:

You’re understandably focused on your own family. You won’t say Hunter’s name. She’s “irrelevant to your life.” You don’t know if Hunter’s child–which you call “it”–is John’s. You just know “It doesn’t look like my children.” You say Hunter had no right to disrupt your marriage. “Women need to have respect for other women.” But during the campaign an aide and friend of John Edwards, Andrew Young, stepped up and claimed paternity of Hunter’s child. Andrew Young has a wife. How do you think she feels about this? How do her children feel about it, and what other kids say about it, when they go to school? Do you really not care if she’s going through whatever she’s going through because she’s playing her part in a lie constructed in service to your husband’s, and your, unstoppable ambition?. How are you respecting her and her marriage?

Both of these people are complete hypocrites, and made for each other. Fortunately, though, they weren’t made for the White House.

One thought on “St. Elizabeth”

  1. I heard that NPR interview driving home yesterday, and it was if anything more nauseating than Kaus makes it out to be. Yes, it’s too bad that Elizabeth Edwards is dying of cancer; but that does not entitle her to a free pass on her reprehensible, unethical, and completely-complicit-in-her-husband’s-lies behavior. They are obviously made for each other.

    And she’s way too cavalier in dismissing the potential paternity issue of Hunter’s child – one day her kids will be wondering if they really have a sibling that they’ve never known, and she (and John) owe it to them to give them the truth.

Comments are closed.