Zombies Or Vampires?

Which political party is which? Kevin Williamson answers the important questions:

Conservatives don’t see liberals as vampires — they’re zombies. The closest thing I’ve seen (or smelled) to a zombie apocalypse happened at Zuccotti Park, the shambolic squatters therein denied the ability to act upon their culinary impulses only by the manifest lack of brains available for eating. We may call liberals “bloodsuckers” and whatnot, and, as Mr. Davis notes, Rush Limbaugh did once go on an Obama-vampire riff, but he has his hematophages all wrong. Rush quotes our own venerable VDH:

Watching the tastes, the behavior, the rhetoric, the appointments, and the policy of this administration suggests to me that it is not really serious in radically altering the existing order, which it counts on despite itself. Its real goal is a sort of parasitism that assumes the survivability of the enfeebled host.

Not vampires, but leeches, ticks, bedbugs, etc. “Vampire” is the word we use for liberals when we’re trying to be nice.

Just so.

8 thoughts on “Zombies Or Vampires?”

  1. Tonight’s the big night Rand. Is it official? Do the Teddy Bears get to have their Pic-Nic as famed in song and story?

    I got an earilier email you were getting damn close.

  2. I think Rand’s summary from Atlas Shrugged is the best: they’re double parasites, who live on the blood of the rich and the sores of the poor. If that doesn’t describe el Presidente, I don’t know what does…

  3. Minor quibble, I think Rush’s riff about the president being a vampire was Clinton, Not Obama. (Clinton was count “Taxula” and his sidick was “algore” (Igor) )

Comments are closed.