3 thoughts on “Michael Mann And Skeptical Science”

  1. “Last month, Skepticalscience was defending Mann against Ryan Simberg and Mark Steyn’s characterization of the hockey stick as fraud, once again, with Mann’s own explanation”

    Better update your bio.

  2. This seems to go to the issue of whether or not is defamatory to describe Mann as “master” of the “tree-ring circus”…

    Oh wait, that was STEYN’s line.

Comments are closed.