…and American exceptionalism:
American exceptionalism — to the extent it remains — is not the product of some sort of genetic superiority. The settlers who made something of Jamestown after Dale’s reforms were the same ones who were bowling in the streets instead of working when he arrived.
What is exceptional about America — at least, what’s been exceptional up to now — is the extent to which individuals were allowed to keep the fruits of their own labor instead of having them seized by people in power for their own purposes. The insight behind American exceptionalism is that people work harder and better for themselves, as free people, than they do as servants for some alleged communal good.
But maybe Shapiro’s right, and this insight isn’t as exceptional as I make out. After all, it’s also contained in a West African proverb, to the effect that “The goat owned in common dies of hunger.”
Human nature isn’t so different, whether you’re in 17th century North America, 19th century Africa or the 21st century United States.
What’s striking isn’t that human nature is the same, but that so many want to pretend that it’s not.
The primary project of the left, since Rousseau, has been about the denial of human nature or, if they conceded that it exists, to force it into a different Procrustean mold, and build the New Soviet Man. All in the name of fairness and compassion, of course.
Care must be taken when talking about exceptionalism. It’s about the premise that government exists by the consent of the governed which itself is a fiction.
American exceptionism died. You can’t get it back by voting in the right people. They don’t understand what it is either.
We are not being represented, we’re being led.
That doesn’t mean give up the fight, but don’t pretend we’re winning when we’re not.