BTW, don’t miss this WUWT post by Jim Steele, which is fast becoming one of everyone’s favorites.
George, that’s fascinating. I especially like the tale of how a paper blaming the decline of the butterfly in question on climate change apparently picked up two orders of magnitude more citations than the paper which had a much more correct and nuanced explanation for the decline (in particular that the climate change actually helped the butterfly rather than hindered it!).
Going? That’s funny, ‘going’.
I enjoyed that one.
BTW, don’t miss this WUWT post by Jim Steele, which is fast becoming one of everyone’s favorites.
George, that’s fascinating. I especially like the tale of how a paper blaming the decline of the butterfly in question on climate change apparently picked up two orders of magnitude more citations than the paper which had a much more correct and nuanced explanation for the decline (in particular that the climate change actually helped the butterfly rather than hindered it!).