4 thoughts on “Air Supremacy”

  1. “They turned students into professors who then turned out more students. That’s how we have to think: the Long March.”

    If he means merely long term effort, I don’t know what will change. There has to be strategy and tactics not just effort. If he means to implement a strategy to dislodge the cultural marxist pov in schools by encouraging libertarian and conservatives to be teachers, then we might be getting somewhere. Over time we may see journalism change if the schools that teach them change.

    “Starting on Monday, October 28th, 2013 the tag line at BillWhittle.com will no longer be SMART CONSERVATIVE THINKING. Starting on Monday we will become THE COMMON-SENSE RESISTANCE.”

    By changing his tagline he will sidestep the baggage of the relentless racist smears from the left but it isn’t the name conservative, Republican, or Tea Party that is the problem. The problem is the smears which will continue regardless of whatever new term is chosen. Changing a name or tag line will do nothing in the long term if there is not a strategy in place to deal with the racist smear campaign.

    For example, “What are you resisting? A black President?” “Resistance? You mean like the confederates?”

    1. So right Wodun. But it is the germ of a seed. Not every seed gets planted or grows. This is the frustration.

      Guerrilla movements are not something you do in the light of day. The fascist are already doing what they can to stamp them out. It may be that one day all of us will be rounded up for what we post.

      Who knows the eventuality?

    2. When you persistently disdain the people in the education sector is it that hard to believe most people in the education sector will be disinclined to follow you? It is sickening, to me at least, to watch Ivy League Republicans extoll the virtues of abandoning studies during high school. You have to wonder why they did not follow their own advice.

      To me the issues in the article started when the right openly became hostile to the regular media. Many conservatives probably felt betrayed during Watergate or by media coverage during the Vietnam War (note me saying conservatives rather than Republicans here). Whereas previously the press had codified rules of at least attempting to appear to be neutral parties regarding left vs right winged politics as more actively funded news sources with a deliberate slant started showing up things went sour from there on. Then they had to fight for their survival. But perhaps I am oversimplifying things. News sources in the US have always been politicized from the get go and no one in the news business can survive without sponsors unless they have someone with deep pockets and possibly vested interests behind them. This is well known.

Comments are closed.