Thoughts On The Mann Suit

from Conrad Black, including commentary on the current sad state of the American legal profession:

…the American legal profession is a suffocating cartel that saps 10 percent of American GDP and through its members in legislatures and regulatory authorities adds 4,000 statutes and regulations a year to the law books, steadily tightening its strangulation of American life, all and always in the name of a society of laws and the ever more equitable refinement of civilization. It would have been impossible and unreasonable to anticipate that so perceptive and spontaneous and fearless an observer as Steyn would not steadily broaden his range of fire, as he has. At one point Steyn began filing motions on his own behalf—the best written court documents you may ever read—that drip with disdain for the judicial process. He quotes Lady MacBeth and describes various pieces of the case using phrases such as “multi-car pileup,” “zombie-like,” “Potemkin hearing” and “meretricious folderol.” It would have been equally unreasonable not to foresee that the authorities upon whom his withering fire descended would not resent this deserved if unaccustomed hostility, and whatever one may think of Mann, he cannot be faulted tactically for trying to tuck himself under the wing of an affronted legal establishment. That does not justify Mann’s infliction of the hockey stick upon the world (like the great Montreal Canadiens point-man Bernard “Boom Boom” Geoffrion lowering—with considerable but probably not sufficient provocation—the real article onto the cranium of a New York Ranger forward sixty years ago) any more than it whitewashes Mann’s own insults. He has dismissed the immensely respected Danish scientist and intellectual Bjorn Lomborg as “a career fossil fuel industry apologist”; Judith Curry, co-editor of the Encyclopedia of Atmospheric Sciences and an honored member of the National Research Council’s climate research committee, as a “serial climate disinformer”; Australian journalist Andrew Bolt as a “villainous” threat to the planet who is paid by Rupert Murdoch “to lie to the public” (Mann apologized for this one after Bolt — in solidarity with Steyn — threatened a lawsuit); and the rest of us as mere “climate change deniers.”

It’s well worth a weekend read.

9 thoughts on “Thoughts On The Mann Suit”

      1. “In the early 2000s, Black had accurately anticipated the decline in profitability of print media assets and sought to divest those types of assets held by Hollinger before their value was irrevocably diminished. The main criminal sanction on Black not overturned is specifically one of misleading investors.[31]”

        You embrace a man convicted of misleading investors, sufficient to spend 3.5 years in jail.
        One is judged by the company he keeps.

        1. One is judged by the company he keeps.

          Indeed. Why Rand do you allow this guy to stick around here?

          1. That’s a good point. I (involuntarily) keep company a lot more with Douchenozzle than I do with Conrad Black (which is to say, as to the latter, not at all).

    1. The words “non sequitur” and “ad hominem” spring to mind. This is a very common Lefty tactic: when one cannot address the substance of the argument, attack the person and Look! Squirrel!

      Anyone with the knowledge of logical fallacies immediately recognizes that the person making such errors has already lost the argument. Perhaps that’s why they don’t teach formal logic in schools – so that the electorate will be not recognize logical fallacies as such and will believe nonsense.

      I’m a little disappointed, dn-guy. Although true to the character you’re portraying in your Lefty parody, this was too easy. Dig a little deeper, man, and you’ll strike comedy gold. So close, so close…

  1. Oh, how I have longed for an Edit Comment feature on this blog… “will be not recognize”? Sheesh.

Comments are closed.