6 thoughts on “IRS Continues To Withhold Documents”

  1. After all of this time with all of the stonewalling and the fact that the IRS persecution of dissidents continued long after it was claimed by the administration to have stopped, it is doubtful that the administration would have the integrity to not have destroyed evidence. I don’t think they will find any smoking gun.

    The same IG agency that “found” the back up tapes is the one that is refusing to release the information in question in this particular article.

    It doesn’t surprise me that Democrats think that the Ferguson investigation is all lies because their party so regularly engages in this type of activity and they assume everyone else must too.

  2. What do they have to hide?

    Private taxpayer information. It’d be an actual scandal if the IRS released private taxpayer data to groups like Cause for Action.

    2. Private taxpayer information.

      Then don’t release private taxpayer information. Obey the law, don’t continue to break it.

      But it is interesting how we have once again, a scheme by which one allegedly has to break the law in order to seek justice. This seems to be devolving to the same place the US intelligence and ATF scandals have sunk to, where one has to be a lawbreaker (whistleblowing statutes seem to be a means to find and punish law abiding, but gullible people) in order to bring evil acts to light.

    3. The fact that there are “potentially 2,000” correspondences between the White House and the IRS concerning inappropriate requests [by the White House] for taxpayer information on individuals and corporations is prima facie evidence of criminal activity. There should be exactly zero such correspondence.

      So the correspondence must not actually exist, since this is the most transparent and accountable Administration in history (of the universe). And given the source, the right-wing rag “The Hill,” I think we can all safely assume that this is a false product of the Koch Machine.

  3. They’d have to literally rather than figuratively rape the American people to be more corrupt. These are the last days folks.

    Jim, you have a lot in common with Bill O’Reilly by being apologist that make their behavior possible. There comes a point when benefit of the doubt is not appropriate because of a pattern of behavior that shows there is little doubt. We are years beyond that point. Any parent could explain it to you but it requires actual adults to put it in action and govt. has few adults running things.

Comments are closed.