Star Trek Heresy

Matthew Continetti does not love Spock.

Last week, I tweeted that I was going to write a post about how Obama is not Spock like, but to the degrees that he is, I agree that it’s Spock’s most annoying traits.

[Afternoon update]

The gauntlet has been thrown:

Continetti just glosses over the sacrifice at the Battle of the Mutara Nebula, I assume because he knows it demolishes his case. What about the personal loss at the betrayal of Valeris? What about the hurtful but necessary decision — directly enforced by Spock — to let Edith Keeler die? How I hated him for that! But look, who among us wouldn’t let Hitler dominate the world in exchange for a lifetime of sweet sweet loving from young Joan Collins? Anyone? No one? Just me?

Heh.

2 thoughts on “Star Trek Heresy”

  1. The idea of mastering one’s emotions lest they instead master you, has much to recommend it — but the Vulcan way depicted in the franchise suggests abject fear of emotion, a cowardly overreaction.

    1. Not everything is well explored or thought out in Star Trek–it was TV, after all–but one thing I thought they did explain well was why the Vulcans suppressed their emotions. They were supposed to be a lot more emotional/passionate than humans, which led them down a very destructive path. Instead of wiping themselves out, they chose a kind of ultra-stoicism.

      There are times I think human culture could use a little more stoicism. . .though nowhere near the emotionlessness of Vulcans.

Comments are closed.