A Liberal College Professor

Afraid of his own students:

The current student-teacher dynamic has been shaped by a large confluence of factors, and perhaps the most important of these is the manner in which cultural studies and social justice writers have comported themselves in popular media. I have a great deal of respect for both of these fields, but their manifestations online, their desire to democratize complex fields of study by making them as digestible as a TGIF sitcom, has led to adoption of a totalizing, simplistic, unworkable, and ultimately stifling conception of social justice. The simplicity and absolutism of this conception has combined with the precarity of academic jobs to create higher ed’s current climate of fear, a heavily policed discourse of semantic sensitivity in which safety and comfort have become the ends and the means of the college experience.

Does anyone really imagine that such an environment is conducive to actual education?

[Update a few minutes later]

Campus justice: punished until proven innocent:

But I’ll let Leiter argue with Weinberg about the case itself, because I want to take issue with this passage: “As I noted earlier, the Title IX investigation yielded no finding of retaliation against Kipnis. One can only imagine how disappointed she will be with this. It turns out that the process she had been demonizing—which of course may have its flaws—pretty much worked, from her point of view.”

I think this is deeply wrong, and for all that, it is not an uncommon sentiment. You often hear this sort of argument when people complain about the byzantine procedures that colleges use to adjudicate charges of a racial or sexual nature, or when they argue that we should always presumptively believe any rape accusation: “Well, if they didn’t do that, the system will figure it out eventually, so what’s the big deal?”

This ignores the fact that the process itself can become the punishment. Sexual assault, racial harassment and similar crimes are serious charges, that should be treated seriously. This makes being charged with such an offense a very big deal for the accused. The judicial process is time consuming, often confusing, and scary. The accused may need to pay for legal advice, even though they often aren’t allowed to take counsel into the system with them. Then there’s the worry of knowing that however crazy the charge sounds to you, the campus judicial process may have very different ideas.

It’s becoming Kafkaesqe.

[Update a couple minutes later]

Another campus-rape case falls apart. At this point, it’s appropriate to ask if there are any of these high-profile cases that aren’t false accusations and fraud.

8 thoughts on “A Liberal College Professor”

    1. The interesting thing is that Walker didn’t destroy the unions, he gave people the choice of whether or not to pay dues. He does the same thing in the article you linked. He gives schools the choice not to have tenure. Choice not force.

  1. “a heavily policed discourse of semantic sensitivity in which safety and comfort have become the ends and the means of the college experience.”

    Comfort? For who? Its a hostile environment for everyone except the cultural marxists until they turn on themselves.

    1. While seeing liberals destroy each other is a fine spectator sport, a lot of other people are also getting damaged. It’s going to take some universities saying “no” to these SJW snowflakes when they make their demands to eventually put an end to it. They may pout, stamp their feet, carry their mattresses, shout, but just say “no” to their demands. If they occupy an office, suspend them. If they file a false complaint, expel them. Their stink is far larger than their numbers. I think a lot of their fellow students are also tired of the antics, show trials, and general insanity.

  2. “This ignores the fact that the process itself can become the punishment.”

    How long has that Mann suit been going on, exactly?

Comments are closed.