Government did. With the help of public-employee unions.
Government is just a word for things we do together, like put charging city inhabitants for toxic drinking water.
4 thoughts on “Who Poisoned Flint?”
Comments are closed.
Government did. With the help of public-employee unions.
Government is just a word for things we do together, like put charging city inhabitants for toxic drinking water.
Comments are closed.
The whole thing reminds me of this. When you discover water in your municipal water supply, your first thought it to blame the state from not protecting you from the city, so call in the federal government… I start thinking the problem didn’t begin with the water supply.
I support water districts. I think it is the practical way of handling water. But I do note, that when the government (blame whoever: governor, efm, council, nearby city…) failed, the solutions to the problem was water provided by businesses. There really is a market solution for clean drinking water in the home.
The update at the bottom of the Reason articles has links to a couple good articles but what makes them good are the comments where people were posting links to pdf’s of documents that take away a lot of the mystery that journalists refuse to do away with.
They could replace the entire thing with concrete and PVC pipes. I think neither are that corrosion resistant. The thing is it costs money. They would probably need to fund it with a local government bonds or whatever. To be paid with the money they got from selling water in the future.
There’s a straight line between this fraudulent blame game and the folks who fall in lover with Bernie’s warmed over bucket of sh**