4 thoughts on “Beta O’Dourke’s Pluralism Failure”

  1. I don’t understand the people backing Beto. He couldn’t win Texas running as a Senate candidate, and he ran a more centrist campaign then. I doubt he could get as many votes now in Texas as he did in 2018. To top it all off, he has near zero influence as a politician. So what’s in it for somebody to give him money?

    1. Beto was hip and cool for a while, but then it kept talking. One of the more devastating take-downs was from women who’d been enthralled with him who finally wrote that “Beto is THAT ex-boyfriend. Immature, narcissistic, forgetful, useless” etc. He’s never thought deeply about anything other than how great he is and how awesome his ideas are. But most amazingly, he keeps lowering the bar on exposing how dumb he is.

      His latest is that we shouldn’t recognize churches that actually believe any part of their own religion over the latest fad of the state. That’s so utterly contrary to anything having to do with the topics of religion or church and state that it boggles the mind.

      In a perfect world, he would marry AOC and have lots of Gretas.

      1. I’m just happy that Beto is openly running as a Democrat opposed to both the 1st and 2nd Amendment. That he has any support on the left shows which people really do want to abolish the Bill of Rights. Usually Democrats try to hide that nature of their progressivism, but Beto is out and proud about it.

      2. In a perfect world, he would marry AOC and have lots of Gretas.

        Who would grow up to imprison them both for developmental theft, they being of the penultimate generation who’s function is mainly that of food source*. Thus granting us all a form of closure.

        After this election cycle what will Beto run for and have any chance of victory? Austin city council?

        * https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7443707/Swedish-scientist-says-humans-cannibals-fight-climate-change.html

Comments are closed.