Up until recently I always thought it meant the cash value of a whole life insurance policy. You know, the part that is meaningful to the policy holder?
Wow didn’t know my house is Marxism re-branded. Just cause I couldn’t buy it in full.
The English Professor using rhetoric to obstruct the issue. A large swath of “social equity” pushers are more trying to bake into the cake a difficulty score for merit. Difficulty of doing this leads to the backlash but still doesn’t mean it is not worth attempting. There is a value to someone who made it to 3rd base from home than someone born on 3rd base. Of course your lot will claim there was no extra difficulty.
Equity isn’t about building people up but rather about scapegoating and tearing people down.
Is there a cogent though to be salvaged in there somewhere? If there is a point, you seem to have completely obfuscated it.
The English Professor using rhetoric to obstruct the issue.
That’s how blogging your opposition to something works. The real question is whether it should be obstructed.
A large swath of “social equity” pushers are more trying to bake into the cake a difficulty score for merit.
What does that even mean?
There is a value to someone who made it to 3rd base from home than someone born on 3rd base.
And they already received a reward for that value by making it to third base.
“The end result can only be the breakdown of civil society—upon the ruins of which, presumably, the Marxists hope to build a shining new world of freedom, justice, and peace.
But will they? Can they? Or will they simply destroy without rebuilding? The long, dark history of Marxist regimes offers sobering answers to those questions.”
To this I offer the best quote about socialism I’ve ever encountered, from the venerable David Horowitz:
“In the vast library of socialist books, there’s not a single volume on how to create wealth, only how to take and “redistribute” it.”
Up until recently I always thought it meant the cash value of a whole life insurance policy. You know, the part that is meaningful to the policy holder?
Wow didn’t know my house is Marxism re-branded. Just cause I couldn’t buy it in full.
The English Professor using rhetoric to obstruct the issue. A large swath of “social equity” pushers are more trying to bake into the cake a difficulty score for merit. Difficulty of doing this leads to the backlash but still doesn’t mean it is not worth attempting. There is a value to someone who made it to 3rd base from home than someone born on 3rd base. Of course your lot will claim there was no extra difficulty.
Equity isn’t about building people up but rather about scapegoating and tearing people down.
Is there a cogent though to be salvaged in there somewhere? If there is a point, you seem to have completely obfuscated it.
The English Professor using rhetoric to obstruct the issue.
That’s how blogging your opposition to something works. The real question is whether it should be obstructed.
A large swath of “social equity” pushers are more trying to bake into the cake a difficulty score for merit.
What does that even mean?
There is a value to someone who made it to 3rd base from home than someone born on 3rd base.
And they already received a reward for that value by making it to third base.
“The end result can only be the breakdown of civil society—upon the ruins of which, presumably, the Marxists hope to build a shining new world of freedom, justice, and peace.
But will they? Can they? Or will they simply destroy without rebuilding? The long, dark history of Marxist regimes offers sobering answers to those questions.”
To this I offer the best quote about socialism I’ve ever encountered, from the venerable David Horowitz:
“In the vast library of socialist books, there’s not a single volume on how to create wealth, only how to take and “redistribute” it.”