How it might be done.
One can dream.
After what Bongino said recently, I wonder if there is any possibility of getting at the truth of what happened during the Clinton administration, including the Foster “suicide,” even if no one is indicted?
[Afternoon update]
Definitely: Gina Haspel should be investigated for covering up the Russia-collusion hoax.
How it might be done.
This link is to a paywalled Substack blog. The video clip of Stefanik taking testimony from Comey was entertaining. Care to summarize the “how it might be done” part for us cheapskates?
Sorry about that; I didn’t follow the link myself. But Instapundit has this quote: “What if the investigation into a criminal conspiracy surrounding the Russia Collusion Hoax was not about the hoax itself, but instead looks at the ongoing effort to mislead or otherwise obstruct Congress from finding out how the Hoax itself came about, and interfere with congressional investigations into the conduct and the motives of the various actors involved?”
Well, I assume that’s “sensitive” information, as per Comey.
including the Foster “suicide,”
Was it three shots to the back of the head or only two? I forget…
The left has Trump Derangement Syndrome; the right has Clinton Derangement Syndrome.
Obama alleged actions to propagate the hoax was done while he was president; so he would be protected by “executive privilege” and/or “immunity”. The investigation into the hoax was done sometime after he left office–true; but what has Obama done personally post presidency that one could reasonable called “obstruction”? He would have to be subpoenaed disposed under oath and commit perjury; don’t see that happening he would merely reply “executive privilege” to any question he didn’t want to answer.