Sunday, Sunday, SUNDAY!

OK, not tomorrow, but next Sunday, for the next Starship attempt.

[Monday-morning update

Stephen Clark has the story on what went wrong on previous flights, and what they’ve done to prevent a recurrence.

But I have no idea what the phrase “human-rated lander” means.

[Sunday-afternoon update]

Less than two hours to go, weather permitting.

[Bumped]

[Tuesday-morning update]

Third time’s the charm?

17 thoughts on “Sunday, Sunday, SUNDAY!”

  1. Interesting how quickly they are able to develop new failure modes…
    Fun that they were able to generate enough force to collapse the internal transfer tube in the booster in the landing experiments!

    Here’s hoping the new Block-3s are more refined. Reportedly there are at least 8 block-3 ships already in production (vs only 4 of the current block-2s built).

  2. But I have no idea what the phrase “human-rated lander” means.
    That the depth of the landing footprint does not exceed the height of the lander occupants?

    1. Correction:

      That the depth of the landing footprint does not exceed the height of the lander occupants at the instant when the lander reaches its minimum altitude.

    2. However the rating would very depending upon the occupant(s). Mice or cockroaches would presumably have a different standard, but we are specifically discussing a human-rated lander…

      Curious if NASA has other ratings?

    1. FAE, methane vapors left in fuel tanks squeezed out when the hull buckled from impacting the water detonating is my guess. I am really impressed that they landed so close to the downrange camera.

Leave a Reply to Cameron G Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *