This is extremely explanatory, and extremely terrifying. I love women as individuals, but we should be societally terrified of them as groups. It’s why many people, including many women, think that it was a mistake to give them the vote. It makes me think that if we were to return to literacy tests to vote, maybe we should have some emotional ones as well. It would exclude many men, but probably many more women.
I doubt literacy or emotional tests would have any effect on who the next mayor of New York City is going to be.
I can’t tell you how many times I have heard my children’s generation start out an argument or persuasion with the preamble, “You know I feel like….”
Glad they have feelings, confused as to who taught them that their emotions were part of a legitimate argument.
Tell me what you think
Yesterday it was reported that 40 million people split from the Anglican church. Exactly two weeks prior King Charles III appointed a woman as Archbishop of Canterbury. So the church lasted 491 years, from 1538 to 2025, under male leadership, and the collapsed in two weeks under female leadership.
Or at least that’s my take on it.
Not to worry nothing to worry about. Because in a few decades AI’s controlling robots will be the entire workplace. All humans male female and everything in between will be essentially non-essential puppets that if they still have jobs aren’t really making any decisions of any import. Of course since women are more interested in the process than the result having meetings everyone gets to talk lots of personal conversations etc. making decisions the results of such aren’t really decisions because the AI is making all the decisions. I may have to walk that back women probably would like that better; They get to come to work they get to chat with their girlfriends they get to scheme/plot/gossip etc and whatever busy work they’re given by the AI which is obviously handling them will have absolutely no effect on really anything and they probably (women) won’t even notice or care.