If this is true, it’s not good for the Narrative.
[Thursday morning update]
Did ABC News doctor the video to make it look like Zimmerman was uninjured?
[Bumped]
If this is true, it’s not good for the Narrative.
[Thursday morning update]
Did ABC News doctor the video to make it look like Zimmerman was uninjured?
[Bumped]
ObamaCare is tyrannical with regard to doctors and insurance companies as well.
I’ll be on at 10:15 EDT tomorrow morning to talk about my PJMedia piece.
…and why it led them so far astray on ObamaCare. My latest is up at PJMedia.
[Update a while later]
ObamCare, and how nice people crush freedom:
…there’s always a good reason to take your freedom away — your health, the poor, your evil opinions, the lousy way you raise your kids — and never a reason to preserve freedom except the love of freedom itself. Thus, so often, the people destroying the American way of life are actually nice people who just want to help.
The paving stones of the road to perdition…
Thoughts from VDH:
What do all these presidential interventions teach us — other than that there are two sides to every story? First, that race and gender are flashpoints in our culture, as liberals see justice routinely denied to Americans on the basis of their sex and skin color, and conservatives believe these issues are continually trumped up to further divide the country and serve the political interests of a partisan elite.
But a larger lesson should be the president’s, because a disturbing pattern has developed in his editorializing, which is aimed exclusively at those whose policies and language he implies lead to horrific acts like the shooting of African-American teenagers, the smearing of young feminists, the shooting of Democratic congresswomen, or the jailing of African-American professors. Yet in every case, further evidence, more information, and subsequent events suggested that the president had offered either incomplete or misleading commentary to the nation, predicated not on a desire for healing or truth, but on a wish to gain partisan advantage.
With the world in recession, facing energy shortages, and on the brink of war, it is politically unwise for the president of the United States to offer commentary on contentious issues, especially before the facts of such disputes are fully known. To do so at worst can interfere with ongoing investigations, and at best pits the office of the presidency against private individuals. In every case, Barack Obama cannot conclude that his commentary created greater unity rather than further polarization.
Oh, he’s clearly quite capable of coming to all manner of delusional conclusions.
A report from today’s SCOTUS arguments. Those fools in the legal media who first predicted that it was so obviously constitutional that the court wouldn’t even take it up are looking ever more foolish.
Also, Madison’s last stand.
Is anyone else annoyed by that Chevron commercial with the kid talking about the thing that her “science” teacher helped her build? I’ve no problem with kids learning stuff like that, but it isn’t “science.” It’s engineering. This kind of thing (like the phrase “rocket scientist”) just promulgates false notions of what science is and isn’t, and doesn’t do much to make sure that kids are taught real science (and no, being taught real science also isn’t being taught that ZOMGaia we’re destroying the Earth!).
Inconveniently for the narrative, George Zimmerman is a registered Democrat. Well, no surprise to me. It is, after all, the party of racist lynchers.
How many crimes did they commit in Florida?
However many it is, don’t expect the racist Attorney General to do anything about it.