…of the Dems, as epitomized by Ed Schultz.
It’s sort of of a piece with this news that Massachusetts has well over a hundred thousand dead or moved voters still on the rolls. I guess that, if they have the same attitude as Ed, they’ll all be voting tomorrow. One guess who the vote will be for.
Thanks to Mr. Schultz, we now know to divide Democrat poll numbers by ten to get the real number of supporters.
Calling Jim, where are you? What is the lefts official party line?
Oh you silly conservatives, when will you ever learn? The liberal over-lords know best what you need. Of course they should do whatever they deem right in order to stay in power. It’s best that you just keep quiet and stay out of the way.
Word up, Tom! GOPteabaggers GTFO! Thug thizzle!
Calling Jim, where are you? What is the lefts official party line?
Vote fraud is wrong, and fortunately virtually non-existent in the real world (as opposed to fevered GOP imaginations).
Were those the same fevered GOP imaginations who told us for 8 years that, “Bush Stole The Election(tm)?”
Boy Jim, that sure must be some good ganga you’re smoking.
Vote fraud is wrong, and fortunately virtually non-existent in the real world
In other words, Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
Were those the same fevered GOP imaginations who told us for 8 years that, “Bush Stole The Election(tm)?”
I don’t recall anyone alleging that Bush stole the election by having people vote multiple times, or under assumed names.
Boy Jim, that sure must be some good ganga you’re smoking.
Feel free to show me some proven examples of large scale voter fraud in recent elections.
I’m not saying that voter fraud doesn’t happen because Democrats are angels; I’m saying it doesn’t happen because it doesn’t make sense. The resources it would take to successfully steal an election with voter fraud can accomplish far more (with no legal risk) if put into legitimate get-out-the-vote efforts.
Feel free to show me some proven examples of large scale voter fraud in recent elections.
You mean besides the Democrat precinct judge that packed all the ballots in her private car and then drove off by herself to deliver them in that Minnesota Race that took months to sort out and won by a small margin? If that’s the case, I could list the various ACORN examples, as ACORN was the resource available to Obama in 2008. And we know ACORN’s get-out-the-vote efforts including registering the entire Dallas Cowboy football team to vote in Nevada.
You mean besides the Democrat precinct judge that packed all the ballots in her private car and then drove off by herself to deliver them in that Minnesota Race that took months to sort out and won by a small margin?
That isn’t voter fraud (ballots cast by fictional or ineligible voters).
And we know ACORN’s get-out-the-vote efforts including registering the entire Dallas Cowboy football team to vote in Nevada.
That isn’t voter fraud either — the Cowboys did not actually cast ballots in Nevada. That’s voter registration fraud, which does not affect election outcomes.
Keep trying.
Here’s your voter fraud. Also, where there is voter registration fraud, you have the ability to fraudulently vote. And yes, a precinct judge in sole possession of a stuffed ballot box can be fraud. Nobody but that precinct judge knows what happened during the transport.
That isn’t voter fraud (ballots cast by fictional or ineligible voters).
Prove it. Proper chain of custody was broken, and fraud was thereby enabled.
Give me a break! I was 18 at the time and hadn’t yet developed a sensible moral structure. I think I even voted liberal once in thoses days [what a dreadful dreadful admission. Such terrible shame… Why did I say it?]…anyway … I would never subject a pig to such experiences today. And I’m sure that whoever stole it was probably going to keep it as a pet. [I hope that makes you feel better ]
Here’s your voter fraud.
Again, that isn’t voter fraud; it isn’t ineligible voters casting ballots.
Also, where there is voter registration fraud, you have the ability to fraudulently vote.
Voter registration fraud is necessary but not sufficient. Imagine that you manage to get 100,000 fraudulent voter registrations (i.e. enough to change the Brown-Coakley outcome) into the system. Then you need to find people willing to commit a felony to impersonate each of those 100,000 people, and keep the whole massive conspiracy a secret.
There are easier, legal ways to win elections.
Prove it. Proper chain of custody was broken, and fraud was thereby enabled.
If you have someone dirty on the inside there’s no need to take the risk of recruiting people to commit voter fraud — the crook can stuff the ballot box all by him or herself.
If ballot tampering is a real problem it suggests we should have tighter procedures for running elections and monitoring ballot handling, not tighter standards for verifying voter eligibility (which is what the GOP is usually arguing for when it trots out the voter fraud boogieman).