Matthew Iglesias gets doxxed after defending the attack on Tucker Carlson’s home.
But that’s not fair, of course, because Matthew is not a “white supremicist.” (Pro Tip: Neither is Tucker).
This shouldn’t happen to anyone, but it’s not going to stop until those defending it feel pain.
“”Matthew is not a “white supremicist.” (Pro Tip: Neither is Tucker).””
While in general I would agree with you but with out personally knowing him. In the last 24 months what has Tucker done or said that persuade you he not white surpremicist he certainly check alot of boxes to be white surpremicist adjacent or willing to pander to them.
He spent a segment on South African Farmer.
He has used the phrase genocide referring to white people.
He blast NFL Players kneeling, (Guessing we hear crickets about Trump not have Rain contingency plans for reaching WW1 memorial Services)
He doesn’t like diversity. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJfUu1LKn44
He fears Change https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/975900177885220865/video/1 , What next maybe he wants to stop the climate from changing too, Humans can copt with that change either.
He against the removal of confederate statues.
HE coaches it as asking questions but nearly every time he on the same side of the issue with David Duke or Richard Spencer.
Hell he is Spencer favorite mainstream conservative commentator https://twitter.com/RichardBSpencer/status/1047258424680108033 just wishes that he be a bit more forth right and cut to the chase instead of dancing around it.
As Popehat says https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/913563143795761152
Maybe could say Tucker incident was goose for gander for this https://dailycaller.com/2018/07/16/sleeping-giants-founder-rivitz/
so his website not only doxxing the founder, Doxxing the wife and friend .
This Doxxing bull shit needs to stop, Both sides point to the other for bad behavior and then escalates it one side needs to be the grown up and stop perpetuating and responding in kind.
“He spent a segment on South African Farmer.
He has used the phrase genocide referring to white people.
He blast NFL Players kneeling, (Guessing we hear crickets about Trump not have Rain contingency plans for reaching WW1 memorial Services)
He doesn’t like diversity. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJfUu1LKn44”
None of these make a person a “white supremacist”.
A “white supremacist” is *only* someone who openly states that “white” people should be supreme on Earth over all others with darker skin coloration. All the other attempts to add in other definitions are specious uses of the phrase to smear someone’s arguments with a meaning that does not apply to that person.
Even if a person *does* state openly the tripe of white supremacy, that is no excuse to expose them to mob violence.
Ah i said
“he certainly check alot of boxes to be white surpremicist adjacent or willing to pander to them.”
then I asked what has he done to prove other wise?
“A “white supremacist” is *only* someone who openly states that “white” people should be supreme on Earth over all others with darker skin coloration. ”
You seem to have a far more narrow definition of white Supremacist with the Earth bit wouldn’t that be white globalist?, how bout one that just believes white people are superior to any other race and that any non white has less values than a white person?
The burden is not on Tucker to prove a negative.
The burden is on you to prove he is and you have failed miserably.
A reasonable person would in no way see Tucker as a white supremacist.
Perhaps the pertinet question is why reason fails you?!?
Now that you mention it, what have you ever done to prove you’re not a “white nationalist.”
And what has it ever done to even hint it is an engineer?
I’m with FC. The writer uses the nom de plume engineer without evidence of being one. What is his license or charter number and with whom?
“…how bout one that just believes white people are superior to any other race and that any non white has less values than a white person?”
This is not an affective definition. It does not describe what a person would do! To be an actual supremacist you have to be affective with it on the world around you. Otherwise you are doing nothing to *make* “whites” supreme. Your’s is the sort of definition that was being used in the 1960s to say “If you’re not part of the solution (i.e. if you don’t march beside us against the war in Vietnam) then you’re part of the problem.” This is the sort of thing that academia made into a campus norm by 1975, and polluted the culture with through doing that.
NO!
Tucker doesn’t believe that. The number of people who believe stuff like that in the USA number in the small thousands.
People who think marxism is something we ought to consider number in the tens of millions. The NAZI were marxists and Spencer holds many leftist views about how society should be except that he favors white people while Democrats disfavor white people. Both groups are racist.
What motivates the small number of white supremacists we have in this country isn’t anything Tucker does, it is the racist attitudes and policies that Democrat’s champion through identity politics. We also shouldn’t let the Democrats get away with avoiding responsibility for creating white nationalism back when their identity politics focused on motivating white people to vote for Democrats.
I thought Democrats wanted us to know who was behind dark money efforts to influence public opinion? His name wasn’t a secret to Democrats, just to the public. Knowing the name of a Democrat crybully isn’t nearly the same thing as organizing mobs to block the streets to a person’s residence while a mob terrorizes women and children in their home.
People are not upset that Tucker was doxed, everyone already knew Tucker’s name. They are upset Democrats sent a lynch mob to his house and terrorized his family. They are upset that Democrats are organizing violent acts against civilians and prominent people. They are upset that the media and Democrat party not only organize and fund these actions but defend them. They are upset that the call for direct action activism has lead to numerous assassination attempts and assaults that weren’t organized.
Thinking differently than Democrats on any of the “check boxes” you mentioned doesn’t make someone a white supremacist. It is also important to note that what he thinks about those issues is very different than what leftists say he thinks about those issues. Actual thoughts don’t really matter because the only check box that needs checked to determine who Democrats will treat him is whether or not he is a Democrat.
If you come back to read the comments and are not a coward, watch this video by a far left Bernie Sanders supporter, Tim Pool, explains how the DNC media carefully crafts deceits to gaslight your perception of reality. It deals specifically with Tucker Carlson.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsEEVw-LqGM
Trigger warning: you might get red pilled.
My question: If the Ku Klux Klan marching at night, dressed in distinctive apparel, disguised so that they can terrorize people in their private dwellings is Bad</em? Then why would anyone condone the behavior of the Antifa?
I really don't care about what someone asserts that Tucker Carlson has done -OR- failed to do in his media job… Do fascists thugs have the right to practice their behavior just because Tucker Carlson is an “uppity” newscaster and should “know his place…”????
It is justified because Democrats have created the moral obligation to act in this way or be condemned as not being sufficiently enthusiastic in their support of the party. This is important because it determines social standing and is a way for Democrats of the wrong ethnicity to absolve themselves of original sin.
How Democrats see non-Democrats and how non-Democrats see themselves are divergent. No profession of belief by non-Democrats will change what Democrats say non-Democrats believe. In fact, whatever non-Democrats say to defend themselves is turned into support for what Democrats think about them because the problem isn’t the words spoken but who speaks them.
That is what the “Its ok to be white” campaign shows. It isn’t about the words but the stereotypes that Democrats have for those who say the words. It doesn’t even matter that the 4chan crowd is more diverse than the average Democrat campaign staff or lefty media company.
Believe that in a meritocracy minorities will enviably rise to all positions in society? Democrats turn meritocracy into a racist term. Against illegal immigration but for legal immigration? Illegal is turned into a racist term and applied to all immigrants.
It doesn’t matter what non-Democrats say or believe because the strategy is to simply change the meaning of words and beliefs to dehumanize non-Democrats.