All posts by Rand Simberg

Bystanders

Mark Steyn discusses the culture of passivity and, as usual, nails it.

I have to say though, after reading this:

On September 11, 2001, the first individual to be named among the dead was the wife of the US Solicitor-General, Barbara Olson, whom I’d sat next to at dinner a couple of months earlier. On September 11, 2003, I woke to the news of the death of the Swedish foreign minister, Anna Lindh, whom I also sat next to a couple of months ago, at a conference.

As much as I enjoy his writing, I’d be a little nervous about having dinner or sitting next to him…

Plea to Capsicum Connoisseurs

I’ve had a bumper crop (in terms of patio farming) of chiles this summer. I’ve got a few Anaheims (that plant didn’t do that well, which is unfortunate, because I use it the most, and often sub it for bell peppers in recipes), quite a few jalapenos (some turning red), a bunch of serranos (about a third of which are now red), a good bush of little yellow but potent tabascos, and the biggest problem–several dozen large habaneros, fit for a sauce for Lucifer himself, and guaranteed to take the hair off any tongue that has the temerity to come within a quarter mile of them. I’m afraid that they’d have the effect of the Guatemalan insanity pepper from the Simpsons episode in which Homer had his vision quest. Muy, muy picante…

What should I do with them, both in terms of when to harvest, how to preserve or dry, and what kind of sauces, salsa, etc. to make with them? Also, how do I do all this, and live, or at least not burn off all of my precious guitar-playing digits?

Conventional Wisdom

Joe Pelton has an editorial over at space.com about space policy. It contains the usual justifications (we need to save ourselves from the asteroids, etc.), but while I agree that there are questions that have to be asked, I’m underwhelmed by his:

Why explore space and why send humans into space?

Why does NASA spend the money it does?

Why does NASA use the resources it has the way it does?

What is NASA?s role in terms of education, health care, energy and job creation?

Why is there not more international cooperation in space activities?

Should the U.S. government, at all levels, not realize it needs to do a better job telling us why space and space research, exploration and applications are key?

Why the focus on NASA? This needs to be framed much broader–what is the role of the government, and of the private sector?

And what’s the big deal about international cooperation? Why is this apparently a desirable goal, in and of itself? There’s no good reason for it to be. We should cooperate if it makes sense, not just for cooperation’s sake.

Non Sequitur

Gregg Easterbrook gives a little history of the Biosphere venture, and how Columbia University has finally ended its affiliation with it. But in the process, he makes a glib comment about the affordability of a Mars mission:

It seems certain that as the space shuttle debate continues, some prominent person will advocate the bold new adventure of a trip to Mars. When someone advocates that, this blog will demolish the idea in detail. Here’s a quick preview. Last week the Wall Street Journal ran a letter to the editor blithely asserting that colonization of Mars could be accomplished “easily and cheaply.” The Russian rocket manufacturer Energia recently estimated that the hardware for a stripped-down manned mission to Mars would weigh a minimum of 600 tons in low-earth orbit. At current space shuttle prices, it costs $15 billion to place 600 tons in low-earth orbit. That’s just the initial launch cost for a stripped-down high-risk flight with a couple of people–spaceship and supplies are extra.

Sorry, Gregg, this does not compute. Why would you take the word of Energia for the mass of a Mars mission, and then make the insane assumption that it would be delivered with a Shuttle (probably the most expensive launch system on the planet, and one to soon go out of business, one way or another)?

If you’re going to go with Russian quotes, use Russian launch prices. Of course, any rational person, contemplating fifteen billion dollars in launch costs, might consider spending that money instead on reducing launch costs…