It’s about to become a right-to-work state. I hope the backlash from the thugs isn’t too bloody, and Lansing doesn’t become Madison.
[Update early afternoon]
I would note though, that the whole state will benefit, not just the lower peninsula. The place is finally starting to undo all the Obama-like damage that Granholm did to it.
Peter Schiff describes what a fantasy it was. No one paid it.
…has begun to eat its own:
The biggest federally funded program (Medicaid) is competing directly with the next-biggest set of programs (education). State politicians are now squeezed between the two most voracious (and unionized) constituencies in American politics: the education blob, and the health care/AARP/provider complex. They will want a way out; otherwise, they’re toast. And the only way out is interposition to Obamacare.
When something can’t go on, at some point, it doesn’t.
And you just proved them right.
[Update a few minutes later]
This seems related, somehow: Why I’m not a Republican. We have one party that thinks we’re stupid, and one that is stupid itself.
…is up.
It’s a half hour until the press conference. They’ve put up this promotional video:
Here‘s the Twitter feed.
[Update a few minutes before the conference is due to begin]
Charlie Martin has a scoop interview with Alan Stern.
[Update at 2 PM EST]
Adam Mann has more over at Wired.
[Via Brian Doherty]
[Update a couple minutes later]
Joel Achenbach has the story at the WaPo as well.
[Update a few minutes in]
Jeff Foust is tweeting from the press conference. So is Alan Boyle.
[Update a while later]
Looks like the company web site has finally gone live.
[Update a while later]
OK, party seems to be over, with a lot of questions remaining. Impressive board, technical architecture described, potential customer interest, but they need to raise billions of dollars.
I personally know almost everyone on the board, FWIW.
…is coming to Michigan?
That would have been unthinkable over the past decades, and would do wonders for the economy there.
Why they’ll never be enough.
Of course, it’s not really about the revenue. It’s about “fairness,” and “social justice.”
[Update a couple minutes later]
Clinton’s budget surpluses were a result of spending cuts, not tax hikes.
It’s the typical socialist mindset:
This question continues to be a puzzle until you realize that when Maddow says “America,” she means not individual Americans or society but government. And now her fallacy is clear. Frédéric Bastiat identified it in 1850. In his classic, The Law, Bastiat wrote that the “socialist” confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all. We disapprove of state education. Then the socialists say that we are opposed to any education… We object to a state-enforced equality. Then they say that we are against equality. And so on, and so on. It is as if the socialists were to accuse us of not wanting persons to eat because we do not want the state to raise grain.
I can see Maddow saying that. One need not be a state socialist, however, to commit this fallacy. It’s done all the time all along the political spectrum. But Maddow offers us a particularly good example.
It’s basically a totalitarian mindset.
I’m a little over a thousand bucks beyond the goal, but I still hope to do much better, if I’m going to properly publicize it.