The good and the bad.
It’s not virtuous, it’s just virtue signaling.
The good and the bad.
It’s not virtuous, it’s just virtue signaling.
…issues loser statement on losing.
What a dummy.
As Steve Hayes and others have suggested, every reporter in every interview should demand that he provide evidence that Cruz broke the law.
BREAKING: The Trump campaign has just released another statement! pic.twitter.com/Dd53f1RixV
— Right Scoop (@trscoop) April 6, 2016
So much fun listening to Trump whining like a baby over how delegate allocation works. Wait until he finds out about third-party runs.
— Apostle To Morons (@Rand_Simberg) April 6, 2016
[Update a couple minutes later]
Irony:
Surprise Trump visit at Wisconsin polling station may have violated the law https://t.co/XKIMA0PYF1 pic.twitter.com/HZLZAD59dD
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) April 6, 2016
[Update a few minutes later]
Why Carly Fiorina is such a good surrogate.
She’d be an excellent VP pick for Cruz.
[Update a few minutes later]
Will Trump learn from Wisconsin?
Magic 8 Ball says, “Outlook not so good.”
If Donald Trump's hopes now rest on him not being Donald Trump, his campaign is in trouble. https://t.co/clBzhY1zoC
— Noah Rothman (@NoahCRothman) April 6, 2016
[Update a while later]
I love this:
As our own John Podhoretz noted, Donald Trump has lowered the bar for himself to such an extent that even displaying the ability to read a prepared text from a teleprompter compels some political analysts to coo over Trump’s “presidential” comportment. It is certainly true that another display of basic literacy may force some columnists to make their peace with Donald Trump as the likely Republican nominee. But that person — the rational, reassuring, policy wonk – is a fabrication. The real Donald Trump, who reveals himself in the candidate’s extemporaneous ramblings, refuses to be stifled. Candidates set the tone for their campaigns; not the other way around. The Trump campaign is a reflection of the reality of their candidate, and the reality is just nuts.
Let’s make him Commander in Chief!
…the students are going to sue.
About time.
[Update a few minutes later]
In which a college clears a student of rape, then retries and convicts him under an insane system.
Administrators shouldn’t have immunity from lawsuits in cases like this.
Salon (of all places) has ten questions that could derail her political career (and possibly send her to Club Fed):
Unlike loyal Hillary supporters who view the marathon Benghazi hearings to be a badge of courage and countless prior scandals to be examples of exoneration, the FBI didn’t spend one year (investigating this email controversy) to give Clinton or her top aides parking tickets. They mean business, and lying to an FBI agent is a felony, so Hillary Clinton and her aides will be forced to tell the truth. The doublespeak involving convenience and retroactive classification won’t matter to seasoned FBI agents whose reputations are on the line; the entire country feels there’s a double-standard regarding this email controversy.
Because there is, of course. But much of the Democrat machine is in denial, and cannot imagine a world in which a Clinton would ever actually have to be accountable for their crimes.
[Update a while later]
Any one or more of these four laws should mean jail for Hillary and her top aides. Here‘s the linked article.
I agree, it’s largely a scam. I buy “organic” kale at Ralph’s, but only because, for some reason, it’s the only way they sell it, and it’s reasonably priced.
This is pretty funny.
Honestly, it’s been a while since I’ve used the subway in New York, so I have no idea how access works, but I’m not pretending otherwise.
A bald supervillain threatens to destroy California.
Heh.
Pro tip to Jerry Brown: If something doesn’t make sense economically, it can’t possibly make sense morally or socially. It just destructive virtue signalling that wrecks lives (particularly those of young people).
An update from Eric Berger in the wake of the successful third flight of New Shepard. The long setback to reusability caused by the Shuttle is finally coming to an end.
[Update a few minutes later]
I wrote a piece a while ago with this theme, but I may have never published it:
Some people have also questioned whether it’s safe to reuse rockets, but Bezos thinks that perception will flip 180 degrees. “That is an argument that’s been made, but I have a different opinion,” he said. “I would much rather fly in a used 787 than on that 787’s first flight. Let somebody else take that first flight. Look, the fact that you just flew it yesterday means that it’s probably really good to fly right now. And that’s going to be true of rocket vehicles, too. In the future, because of reusability, nobody with a really expensive satellite is going to want to put it on an unused rocket. They’re going to decide that’s too risky. Now that will take a while, but that’s what’s going to happen.”
…”Our first orbital vehicle will not be our last, and it will be the smallest orbital vehicle we will ever build,” Bezos said. And to make it all affordable, says the man who has upended online retailing with Amazon.com, rockets must launch, land, and then fly again. When he’s asked about plans by government agencies and others to build large, expendable rockets, Bezos seems unable to understand that kind of business practice in the 21st century.
“What I know you cannot afford is throwing the hardware away,” he said. “Hardware is so expensive. Look around at the precision you see here. The turbopumps with beautifully machined propellers. It’s just a tragedy to throw all of that away. You can never make a step function change in cost if you’re throwing the hardware away.”
In a couple decades, people will marvel at the stubborn persistence some in throwing expensive hardware away.
It could provide a potential blueprint to stop Trump. It’s a deep dive into the remaining races and delegate allocation.
I’m not as shocked that cholesterol-reduction drugs don’t alleviate heart problems as these “scientists” are. There’s plenty of good science out there, but it doesn’t fit the orthodoxy, and encouraging better (not low-fat or low-cholesterol) diets don’t generate revenue for drug companies.
One other point: Nowhere in that article is the fact that taking CoQ10 can alleviate muscle pain from statins discussed. What a bunch of crap.