Category Archives: Media Criticism
Amanda Marcotte’s Idiocy About Men And Babies
Hey, she deserves it, but really, this is just cruel.
America’s Transportation Infrastructure
No, Mr. President. It was best built by America’s entrepreneurs.
This is one of many reasons why high-speed rail will be a fiscal disaster.
The Space Launch System
IRS And Benghazi
We need a select committee for both, since the administration continues to stonewall. I really don’t understand Boehner’s reticence in this. They don’t have to make the mistake of impeaching before the election, as the Republicans did in 1998, but they could certainly lay the groundwork for it next year, and an issue in Senate races.
Oh, and speaking of stonewalling, is it 2013, or forty years earlier?
The AGU Statement On Climate Change
…and Roger Pielke’s response.
It’s shameful the way that scientific societies have become politicized.
Fort Hood Was Islamist Terror
…not “workplace violence.”
I signed the petition.
One Cheer For Mike Bloomberg
Senator Leahy says that he actually hurt the gun-control cause. So, sometimes bad intentions can have good results.
Baghdad Bob At The White House
What in the hell does “the core of Al Qaeda” even mean?
It’s a de facto “core” even if the administration doesn’t want to call it that, just as there’s a de facto U.S. retreat is in progress even if the administration doesn’t want to call it that. After all, the evacuation of personnel and the closure of diplomatic missions are physical acts involving actual people being transported thousands of miles. They are actions in which real concrete and steel buildings are being shuttered, at least temporarily. Set against these tangible events are Carney’s word games about the core and the periphery.
This is nothing except a pathetic attempt to continue to maintain the campaign lies of last year.
To The New Editor Of Science Magazine
An open letter:
…you do have an unparalleled opportunity, which is to turn what has become just another glossy advocacy magazine back into a distinguished scientific journal.
Unfortunately, during the intervening 35 years of your remarkable scientific career since you were a graduate student, a once-stellar magazine has fallen on hard times. Starting with Donald Kennedy, and continuing under Bruce Alberts, it has become a shabby vehicle for strident climate activism … and that experiment has proven once again that Science can’t be both an activist journal and a scientific journal. Science magazine has thrown its considerable (but rapidly decreasing) weight behind a number of causes. And yes, some of those causes are indeed important.
The problem is that you are convinced the causes are hugely important, and you want to convince us of the same. But once you convince people that your causes are more important to you than your science, that’s it for your authority regarding the science. You either get to have activism, or you get scientific authority. You don’t get both. And the past actions of your magazine have clearly demonstrated that these days your activist causes are much more important to you than the science.
Read all.