Like Joe Katzman, I don’t think that’s too strong a word for it any more. Steve Hayward has an extensive roundup of all the problems at the IPCC (though I could have done without the naked Al Gore picture).
Also, remember how we were told, even by warm mongering commenters here, that the CRU data didn’t matter because we had GISS?
Nope.
The NASA scientists also felt that NASA GISS data was inferior to the National Climate Data Center Global Historical Climate Network (NCDC GHCN) database.
These emails, obtained by Christopher Horner, also show that the NASA GISS dataset was not independent of CRU data.
Further, all of this information regarding the accuracy and independence of NASA GISS data was directly communicated to a reporter from USA Today in August 2007.
The reporter never published it.
Of course not. Didn’t fit the template.
Hansen should be drummed out of the global “science” community, if they want to regain any credibility.
[Update a few minutes later]
As I’ve noted before, this isn’t just a science scandal, it’s a media scandal. If they were fooled by these charlatans, it’s because they wanted to be.
[Late morning update]
More from Chris Horner — three of the four data sets are irrevocably tainted. But the faithful will not waver in their religion.
[Early afternoon update]
A video interview with Chris Horner — the climate cover up spreads to NASA.