Andy Revkin has the story.
I may respond to the Carnegie-Mellon letter later, after reading.
[Update a few minutes later]
Judith Curry, the biggest threat to the “consensus”?
Andy Revkin has the story.
I may respond to the Carnegie-Mellon letter later, after reading.
[Update a few minutes later]
Judith Curry, the biggest threat to the “consensus”?
An almost book-length book review of Naomi Klein’s idiotic book.
His reaction to yesterday’s filings.
A new paper that indicates it’s probably much lower than the models think.
We filed our response in the appeal. I have some excerpts over at Ricochet.
[Afternoon update]
[Update a couple minutes later]
He doesn’t link it, but I think that this is the Bishop Hill post being referred to.
[Late afternoon update]
Here‘s the formal statement from Sam Kazman, lead counsel for CEI.
Physics Today uncritically reports on Koonin’s WSJ piece.
This really should be a strike below the waterline of the “consensus.” It’s nice to see that APS has come to its senses.
Meanwhile, there was an extraordinary meeting in Bath. I’d have liked to have been there.
The truther brigade circles the wagons.
The Salk Institute may have found the on/off switch. This could have implications for both life extension and cancer treatment.
And clearly a stupid one to boot.
He should either substantiate his claim, or apologize to President Bush, but I suspect his ego will just cause him to continue to ignore the criticism.